2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta-Blocker and Renin–Angiotensin System Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prediabetes or Diabetes Who Underwent Successful Implantation of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Retrospective Observational Registry Study

Abstract: Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes or diabetes who received ß-blockers (BB) and renin–angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) therapy after successful newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are limited. We compared the two-year clinical outcomes in such patients. A total of 9466 patients with AMI in the Korea AMI Registry were classified into six groups according to their glycemic status and presence or absence of BB + RASI therapy: normog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine meaningful variables, all variables with p < 0.001 were included in the univariate analysis (Supplementary material 2). After univariate analysis, variables with p < 0.001 and known conventional risk factors of poor outcomes in the AMI population were considered potential confounding factors, and were entered into the multivariate analysis [22]. Various clinical outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and intergroup differences were compared using the log-rank test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine meaningful variables, all variables with p < 0.001 were included in the univariate analysis (Supplementary material 2). After univariate analysis, variables with p < 0.001 and known conventional risk factors of poor outcomes in the AMI population were considered potential confounding factors, and were entered into the multivariate analysis [22]. Various clinical outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and intergroup differences were compared using the log-rank test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine meaningful variables, all variables with p < 0.001 were included in the univariate analysis (Additional file 1 : 6). After univariate analysis, variables with p < 0.001 and known conventional risk factors of poor outcomes in the AMI population were considered potential confounding factors, and were entered into the multivariate analysis [ 25 ]. Various clinical outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and intergroup differences were compared using the log-rank test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%