2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.199428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta and Returns Revisited: Evidence from the German Stock Market

Abstract: Traditional tests of the CAPM following the Fama / MacBeth (1973) procedure are tests of the joint hypotheses that there is a relationship between beta and realized return and that the market risk premium is positive. The conditional test procedure developed by Pettengill / Sundaram / Mathur (1995) allows to independently test the hypothesis of a relation between beta and realized returns. Monte Carlo simulations show that the conditional test reliably identifies this relation. In an empirical examination for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
26
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with other studies on the German capital market (see for example Elsas, El-Shaer, and Theissen (2003)). As shown in Table 4, the realized market risk premium over the observation period is 0.293% per month with a standard deviation of 5.876%.…”
Section: Panel C Ofsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with other studies on the German capital market (see for example Elsas, El-Shaer, and Theissen (2003)). As shown in Table 4, the realized market risk premium over the observation period is 0.293% per month with a standard deviation of 5.876%.…”
Section: Panel C Ofsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…r M < r f ) is about 48% (r M denotes the market return and r f is the risk free rate). Under such conditions, the power of typical asset pricing test approaches is fairly low, see Elsas, El-Shaer, and Theissen (2003) and Pettengill, Sundaram, and Mathur (1995). Table 6 further shows that the estimates of the risk premia for SMB, HML and the default risk factor DEF are significantly different from zero.…”
Section: Panel C Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 Many studies apply the PSM methodology to other markets. These include: Fletcher (1997Fletcher ( , 2000 and Hung et al (2004) for the UK market; Isakov (1999) for the Swiss market; Lam (2001) and Ho et al (2006) for the Hong Kong market; Elsas et al (2003) for the German market; Hodoshima et al (2000) for the Japanese market; Faff (2001) for the Australian market; and Sandoval and Saens (2004) for four Latin American markets. The overwhelming preponderance of these studies supports the PSM conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index representing the market, the time period or the frequency used will result in different values for the Beta. Many have been the studies undertaken to demonstrate that the actual estimation of this parameter according to the CAPM is not the best solution, including Elsas et al (2003) Fernández & Carabias (2007), Fernández (2008a2008b), Fernández (2009a2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%