Progress in Colloid &Amp; Polymer Science
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0117381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bestimmung der Oberflächenacidität von porösem Siliciumdioxid durch Titration im aprotischen Solvens und Vergleich der Ergebnisse mit denen aus infrarotspektroskopischen Messungen und heterogenem Isotopenaustausch mit HTO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify a liquid in terms of its HBA property or basicity, among others, the following physicochemical parameters have been well established: Gutmann's donor number (DN), which corresponds to the reaction enthalpy of the HBA solvent with SbCl 5 , which serves as the reference electron pair acceptor, measured in 1,2-dichloroethane, , the p K (BH + ) value, the protonation equilibrium constant in water, or the β value introduced by Kamlet and Taft, which results from the solvatochromism of several reference compounds . A critical review of the applicability of the different empirical HBA property parameters is given by Marcus and Gritzner …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify a liquid in terms of its HBA property or basicity, among others, the following physicochemical parameters have been well established: Gutmann's donor number (DN), which corresponds to the reaction enthalpy of the HBA solvent with SbCl 5 , which serves as the reference electron pair acceptor, measured in 1,2-dichloroethane, , the p K (BH + ) value, the protonation equilibrium constant in water, or the β value introduced by Kamlet and Taft, which results from the solvatochromism of several reference compounds . A critical review of the applicability of the different empirical HBA property parameters is given by Marcus and Gritzner …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have shown that the Kamlet−Taft solvent parameters α, β, and π* are well suited for the quantitative description of solvent−solid interfacial interactions, in chromatographic 12 and adsorption processes, rather than parameters derived using water as the reference liquid. , Furthermore, the advantage of the Kamlet−Taft parameters is that they can be converted by means of multiple LSE relationships into other useful polarity scales, for example, the acceptor number (AN) or donor number (DN) scales of Gutmann 16,17,24 and the E T (30) scale of Reichardt …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%