1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00416297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bestimmung der Genauigkeit und der Fehlerquellen des Rippsteinschen Verfahrens zur Messung der Antetorsion des coxalen Femurendes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This angle was defined as the “projected AVA.” This procedure was performed on the affected as well as the healthy femur. Values obtained were compared to the conversion table values published by Müller and Rippstein, [25] and the “real CCD angle” and “real AVA” were recorded for further analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This angle was defined as the “projected AVA.” This procedure was performed on the affected as well as the healthy femur. Values obtained were compared to the conversion table values published by Müller and Rippstein, [25] and the “real CCD angle” and “real AVA” were recorded for further analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the interobserver error and to reduce the known sources of error by this method (Gross andHaike 1970, ReikerAs et al 1985), all the radiographic measurements were performed by the same individual (SS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- Rippstein (1955) found the same error in measurements of wire models. - Gross and haike (1970) checked their measurements (Rippstein's method) post mortem after dissection of the femora and found a maximum error of Such good results however can only be obtained, when the measurement is carried out with the upmost care for the details of the procedure, especially the correct positioning of the patient on the X-ray table. Dunlap et al (1953) and Gross and Haike (1 970) have analyzed the influence of potential errors in the procedure on the accuracy of the measurements; Positioning errors concerning rotation in the hip joints:…”
Section: The Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%