2013
DOI: 10.1186/1029-242x-2013-94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best proximity points for generalized proximal C-contraction mappings in metric spaces with partial orders

Abstract: In this paper we extend the notion of weakly C-contraction mappings to the case of non-self mappings and establish the best proximity point theorems for this class. Our results generalize the result due to Harjani et al. (Comput. Math. Appl. 61:790-796, 2011) and some other authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, many researchers have studied the existence and convergence of best proximity point results in many ways [9,26,24,25,27,29,32,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, many researchers have studied the existence and convergence of best proximity point results in many ways [9,26,24,25,27,29,32,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an extension of the best proximity point problem. There are several results dealing with proximity point problem in the setup of metric spaces (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and references mentioned therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a mathematical context, studies are available, for instance, in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and the references therein, following its introduction and characterization by Zadeh [4]. Among the research performed on the subject, effort has been devoted to the investigation of the existence and uniqueness of fixed points, best proximity points, fuzzy fixed points, fuzzy best proximity points, common fuzzy fixed points and optimal fuzzy coincidence points [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%