2015
DOI: 10.5539/ijsp.v4n2p132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Predictive Generalized Linear Mixed Model with Predictive Lasso for High-Speed Network Data Analysis

Abstract: Optimizing network usage is important to maximize the network performance. When the network usage grows rapidly, it is important to build an accurate predictive model. We present a new predictive algorithm which can analyze the network performance in various network conditions and traffic patterns. Our approach is based on the best predictive generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The parameters of the best predictive GLMM are estimated by minimizing the mean squared prediction error (MSPE). To expedite the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, using regularized PQL for fast model selection only mirrors other works in the GLM context, where penalized likelihood approaches have been proposed purely as a means of computationally efficient model selection (e.g., Schelldorfer et al, 2014;Hui et al, 2015). Of course, we acknowledge further simulations are required to fully assess the robustness of regularized PQL selection e.g., how it performs when the truly non-zero coefficients and hence signal to noise ratio is small, and that there are other methods of joint selection in GLMMs which were not included in our study e.g., the predictive shrinkage selection method of Hu et al (2015) designed specifically for Poisson mixture models in the context of network analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, using regularized PQL for fast model selection only mirrors other works in the GLM context, where penalized likelihood approaches have been proposed purely as a means of computationally efficient model selection (e.g., Schelldorfer et al, 2014;Hui et al, 2015). Of course, we acknowledge further simulations are required to fully assess the robustness of regularized PQL selection e.g., how it performs when the truly non-zero coefficients and hence signal to noise ratio is small, and that there are other methods of joint selection in GLMMs which were not included in our study e.g., the predictive shrinkage selection method of Hu et al (2015) designed specifically for Poisson mixture models in the context of network analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%