2009
DOI: 10.1177/0192623309336154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Practices for Use of Historical Control Data of Proliferative Rodent Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, more than 50 single data items describing the experimental conditions are collected (Morawietz et al 1992 and Table 1). These data items are compatible with the relevant variables identified by the STP working group on historical control data (Keenan et al 2009). …”
Section: Page 5 Of 43supporting
confidence: 60%
“…In addition, more than 50 single data items describing the experimental conditions are collected (Morawietz et al 1992 and Table 1). These data items are compatible with the relevant variables identified by the STP working group on historical control data (Keenan et al 2009). …”
Section: Page 5 Of 43supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Historical data can be used to identify aberrant control data, to understand the relevance of increases in low-incidence findings, and/or to interpret minor differences from controls. Historical data are particularly important in the evaluation of proliferative rodent lesions (Keenan et al 2009). The working group agreed that the establishment and use of historical control data should be scientifically responsible, in that only recent studies (preferably within 5 years of primary study), performed with the genetically identical animal strain of similar age and under comparable experimental and environmental conditions, should be used for reference.…”
Section: Exacerbation Of Spontaneous/background Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCD are most useful if these factors are standardized and reported in adequate detail. 60,117 In the RITA and NACAD databases 60,116,118 and in the NTP database, data are collected by standardized procedures for tissue sampling and trimming, histopathology is assessed according to internationally harmonized nomenclature and diagnostic (INHAND) criteria, and validity of data is also confirmed by peer review. The Mouse Tumor Biology Database (http://tumor.informatics.jax.org/) and Pathbase (http:// www.pathbase.net) use standardized mouse anatomy and pathology ontologies in the Mouse Disease Information System (MoDIS) for data capture, and accept mouse pathology data and images from the Jackson Aging Center initiative, as well as from the scientific community.…”
Section: Grading Of Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%