2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Practice Methods to Apply to Measurement of Resting Metabolic Rate in Adults: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
631
3
22

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 745 publications
(698 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
8
631
3
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Before main trials resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured on two separate occasions in order to obtain reliable baseline results (Compher et al 2006;Roffey et al 2006). For these tests participants reported to the laboratory in the morning (~07:30) having not eaten since the previous evening.…”
Section: Preliminary Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before main trials resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured on two separate occasions in order to obtain reliable baseline results (Compher et al 2006;Roffey et al 2006). For these tests participants reported to the laboratory in the morning (~07:30) having not eaten since the previous evening.…”
Section: Preliminary Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these tests participants reported to the laboratory in the morning (~07:30) having not eaten since the previous evening. Resting metabolic rate assessments followed the guidance of Compher et al (2006). In brief, participants were asked: not to exercise during the preceding 24 h; not to consume caffeine, alcohol or drugs during the preceding 24 h; to remain fasted for at least 10 h prior to laboratory entry; to record what they had eaten in the preceding 24 h in order to replicate this feeding pattern prior to the second RMR measurement; to eliminate uncontrolled activity by travelling to the laboratory by motorised transport, with any essential walking being kept to < 50 metres.…”
Section: Preliminary Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires specific conditions for reproducibility of results, such as the following: a) adhesion to a protocol establishing fasting period, intake restriction of some substances, such as caffeine, ethanol and nicotine, as well as restriction to physical activities previously to the assessment; b) a physically comfortable place under temperatures between 20º and 25 C; and c) patients must rest for 10 to 20 minutes before assessment, and then they must lay still in supine position for the collection of respiratory gases, whose quotient must be located in the interval >0,7 and <1 (Compher et al 2006). This strict protocol for the assessment of BMR and the difficulties showed by some GD III patients in remaining in supine position may compromise its application as a biomarker of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were converted into kcal/day and compared with BMR as estimated by the Harris-Benedict equation (Harris and Benedict 1919). Differences up to 10% between BMR and the values of Harris-Benedict equation were not considered clinically relevant because studies have reported that the reassessment of indirect calorimetry in healthy individuals can result in alterations by 3-5% when conducted after 24 hours or up to 10% when conducted after weeks or months (Compher et al 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data of the first 5 min were discarded. Patients were measured in standardized conditions [16] and on-going feeding was not interrupted.…”
Section: ❖ Indirect Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%