2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63533-4.00001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Practice in Coring and Core Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of laboratory methods is available to define the wettability of core plugs, e.g., contact angle measurements, the Amott–Harvey method, and the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) method [ 3 ]. One of the most well-known and widely used methods to deduce or assess wettability is the Amott imbibition test, which is applied not only to sandstones but also carbonates [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of laboratory methods is available to define the wettability of core plugs, e.g., contact angle measurements, the Amott–Harvey method, and the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) method [ 3 ]. One of the most well-known and widely used methods to deduce or assess wettability is the Amott imbibition test, which is applied not only to sandstones but also carbonates [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For relative permeability, the steady state method is widely considered to provide the most reliable results in the midsaturation range (McPhee et al, ). Here a stable fluid distribution at a known fractional flow, f w , is established while the saturation and pressure drop are recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, subsurface flow models at the aquifer scale employ a continuum approach based on extended Darcy's law, resolving subsurface features at scales of 10s to 100s of meters to tractably simulate plume migration. These models are generally populated with multiphase flow parameters (relative permeability, capillary pressure and trapping) which are derived from viscous limit core flood experiments, measured at high flow rates on subsurface rock cores preferentially selected for homogeneity (McPhee et al 2015) While this approach is effective for high capillary number flows occurring in homogeneous media, it breaks down when the capillary number is low and small-scale capillary heterogeneities (i.e. laminae and bedding features below seismic resolution of ~10m) start to impact the flow regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%