2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13002-020-0360-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Berries, greens, and medicinal herbs—mapping and assessing wild plants as an ecosystem service in Transylvania (Romania)

Abstract: Background: Wild edible plants as well as medicinal herbs are still widely used natural resources in Eastern Europe that are frequently accessed by the local population. Ethnobotanical studies rarely give insight to the specific ecosystems in which wild food and medicinal plants grow in a spatially explicit way. The present work assesses the potential of different ecosystems to provide wild plants for food and medicinal use based on 37 selected plant species, gives an estimate on the actual use of wild plants,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our ES statements and typology is a balance between a commonly accepted ES typology and interpretability for local stakeholders. Two of our ES, ‘hunting and fishing’ and ‘wild plants, berries and mushrooms for food’ can be classified as cultural and as provisioning ES since both provide food and are linked to social interaction, recreation and cultural traditions (Stryamets et al., 2015; Vári et al., 2020). However, we have considered these as cultural ES which is consistent with the socio‐demographics of NBR and other studies in similar contexts (Malmborg et al., 2021; Meacham et al., 2016; Quieroz et al., 2015; Stryamets et al., 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our ES statements and typology is a balance between a commonly accepted ES typology and interpretability for local stakeholders. Two of our ES, ‘hunting and fishing’ and ‘wild plants, berries and mushrooms for food’ can be classified as cultural and as provisioning ES since both provide food and are linked to social interaction, recreation and cultural traditions (Stryamets et al., 2015; Vári et al., 2020). However, we have considered these as cultural ES which is consistent with the socio‐demographics of NBR and other studies in similar contexts (Malmborg et al., 2021; Meacham et al., 2016; Quieroz et al., 2015; Stryamets et al., 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More focus should also be directed to the use of non-timber forest products, forest fruits, and mushrooms, as well as medicinal plants. The results suggest that while the potential is somewhat recognised in some PAs, there is more that could be done, particularly at a time when consumers are demanding more organic, wild, local, and seasonal products (Vári, Á. et al 2017(Vári, Á. et al , 2020Keesstra, S. et al 2018). For example, the production of more organic forest honey, the sustainable use of wild vegetables and wild fruits such as berries, chesnuts, mushrooms would all contribute to the better coexistence of nature and people, while minimising the anthropogenic disturbance of natural processes in the forests (Simončič, T. and Matijašič, D. 2013;Shackleton, C.M.…”
Section: Ecosystem Services For Supporting Development Of Pbbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, blackberry and raspberry (Rubus fruticosus and R. idaeus), European elder (Sambucus nigra), European wild garlic (ramsons; Allium ursinum), wild ginger (Asarum europaeum), Saint John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum), and stinging nettle (Urtica dioecia) are used medicinally, as foods or flavorings, and as sources of income across Eastern Europe, including the Carpathian Mountains. As in Appalachia, these species have deep connections to cultural identities and a long history of use that connect traditional and local knowledge to rural economies, ecosystem services, and international markets (Vári et al 2020).…”
Section: Diversity Of Plants and Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%