Berichte über Kreislaufstillstände und kardiopulmonale Reanimationen

Jacobs, Ian; Bahr, J.; Berg, Robert A.; Billi, John E.; Bossaert, Leo; Cassan, Pascal; Coovadia, Ashraf; DeEste, K.; Finn, Judith; Halperin, Henry R.; Handley, Anthony J.; Herlitz, Johan; Hickey, Robert W.; Idris, Ahamed H.; Kloeck, Walter; Larkin, Gregory Luke; Mancini, Mary E.; Mason, Pip; Mears, Gregory; Monsieurs, Koenraad G.; Montgomery, William; Morley, Peter; Nichol, Graham; Nolan, Jerry P.; Okada, Kazuo; Perlman, Jeffrey M.; Shüster, Michael; Pa, Steen; Sterz, Fritz; Tibballs, James; Timerman, Sérgio; Truitt, Tanya Lane; Zideman, David

doi:10.1007/s10049-005-0754-2

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If an AED is used, ARREST personnel visit the AED site shortly after the OHCA and collect the AED ECG recording using AED-specific software. Data items concerning the CPR procedure (witness of OHCA, bystander CPR performed, and AED use) are collected according to Utstein recommendations 13 by means of a precoded set of questions that ambulance staff are required to answer and by retrieving ambulance data of the event. Data on postresuscitation care (therapeutic hypothermia [TH] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) were derived from hospital records.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Amsterdam Resuscitation Study (ARREST) is an ongoing, prospective registry of all-cause OHCA in the North Holland province of The Netherlands. ARREST was set up to establish the determinants of outcome of OHCA 8,9 and to gain insight in the genetic, clinical, andBackground-In recent years, a wider use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was advocated in The Netherlands. We aimed to establish whether survival with favorable neurologic outcome after outof-hospital cardiac arrest has significantly increased, and, if so, whether this is attributable to AED use. Methods and Results-We performed a population-based cohort study, including patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from cardiac causes between 2006 and 2012, excluding emergency medical service-witnessed arrests. We determined survival status at each stage (to emergency department, to admission, and to discharge) and examined temporal trends using logistic regression analysis with year of resuscitation as an independent variable. By adding each covariable subsequently to the regression model, we investigated their impact on the odds ratio of year of resuscitation.

show abstract

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…19,20 In this observational study, we enrolled all patients aged ≥18 years who had experienced OHCA before the arrival of the emergency medical services (EMS), had been resuscitated by EMS personnel, and then transported to a medical institution in Osaka Prefecture between January 1, 2007 and December 31,2009. The research protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Osaka University with the assent of the EMS authorities of the local governments in Osaka Prefecture.…”

Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…19, 20 An arrest was presumed to be of cardiac etiology unless it was caused by trauma, drowning, drug overdose, asphyxia, exsanguination, or any other noncardiac cause. These diagnoses were determined by the physician in charge in collaboration with the EMS rescuers.…”

Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Early Intravenous Epinephrine Administration on Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Hayashi

Iwami

Kitamura

et al. 2012

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…25 The study used information available from dispatch, emergency medical services, hospital, and death certificate records.…”

Section: Covariatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chest Compression Alone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated With Better Long-Term Survival Compared with Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O ut-of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of death worldwide.1,2 Resuscitation is challenging but achievable and relies in part on the chain of survival that includes early arrest recognition and emergency activation, early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), early defibrillation, expert advanced life support, and integrated postresuscitation care.3 Specifically, early CPR performed by laypersons can double the chances of survival and provides an important foundation for subsequent links in the chain of survival. 4 In most communities, however, fewer than half of all persons who have had cardiac arrests receive bystander CPR before the arrival of professional rescuers. Clinical Perspective on p 441Different approaches have been used to encourage and improve bystander CPR. One such approach is for the lay rescuer to provide bystander CPR that consists of chest compressions only in contrast to traditional CPR that comprises chest compressions interposed with rescue breathing. Chest compression alone is easier and quicker to initiate and so might provide for earlier CPR among a greater number of persons with OHCA. However, the comparative effectiveness of chest compression alone versus traditional CPR performed by laypersons Background-Little is known about the long-term survival effects of type-specific bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the community. We hypothesized that dispatcher instruction consisting of chest compression alone would be associated with better overall long-term prognosis in comparison with chest compression plus rescue breathing. Methods and Results-The investigation was a retrospective cohort study that combined 2 randomized trials comparing the short-term survival effects of dispatcher CPR instruction consisting either of chest compression alone or chest compression plus rescue breathing. Long-term vital status was ascertained by using the respective National and State death records through July 31, 2011. We performed Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression to evaluate survival according to the type of CPR instruction. Of the 2496 subjects included in the current investigation, 1243 (50%) were randomly assigned to chest compression alone and 1253 (50%) were randomly assigned to chest compression plus rescue breathing. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 CPR groups. During the 1153.2 person-years of follow-up, there were 2260 deaths and 236 long-term survivors. Randomization to chest compression alone in comparison with chest compression plus rescue breathing was associated with a lower risk of death after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99; P=0.02). Conclusions-The findings provide strong support for long-term mortality benefit of dispatcher CPR instruction strategy consisting of chest compression alone rather than chest compression plus rescue breathing among adult patients with cardiac arrest requiring dispatcher assistance. (Circulation. 2013;127:435-441.)

show abstract

Berichte über Kreislaufstillstände und kardiopulmonale Reanimationen

Cited by 5 publications

References 28 publications

Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators

Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators

Impact of Early Intravenous Epinephrine Administration on Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Chest Compression Alone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated With Better Long-Term Survival Compared with Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About