2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12136-012-0154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bergmann’s Dilemma and Internalism’s Escape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases (1), (2), and (3), the Mādhva can assert that they have an awareness of the relevant facts through direct acquaintance, which occurs when a person is acquainted with an object by standing in a direct cognitive relationship to it (Russell (1910)). As John DePoe states, ‘direct acquaintance is a kind of awareness that is unmediated, non-inferential, and does not involve the application of any concepts’ (DePoe (2012), 419). Following Richard Fumerton (1995, 73–79), DePoe states that an individual has non-inferential justification for believing a proposition P when they are directly acquainted with the fact that P, directly acquainted with the thought that P, and directly acquainted with the correspondence that holds between the fact that P and the thought that P (DePoe (2012), 420).…”
Section: Addressing Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cases (1), (2), and (3), the Mādhva can assert that they have an awareness of the relevant facts through direct acquaintance, which occurs when a person is acquainted with an object by standing in a direct cognitive relationship to it (Russell (1910)). As John DePoe states, ‘direct acquaintance is a kind of awareness that is unmediated, non-inferential, and does not involve the application of any concepts’ (DePoe (2012), 419). Following Richard Fumerton (1995, 73–79), DePoe states that an individual has non-inferential justification for believing a proposition P when they are directly acquainted with the fact that P, directly acquainted with the thought that P, and directly acquainted with the correspondence that holds between the fact that P and the thought that P (DePoe (2012), 420).…”
Section: Addressing Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is not, then the Mādhva remains exposed to the SPO. Nevertheless, the Mādhva, following DePoe, can maintain that only a weak awareness of this correspondence is required and that such weak awareness is far from being the type of stray hunch or arbitrary conviction that Bergmann describes when defining the SPO (DePoe (2012), 421).…”
Section: Addressing Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary acquaintance theorists—i.e., those who appeal to the philosophical notion of acquaintance in a substantial and positive way—include Balog (2012, 2019), Bigelow and Pargetter (1990, 2006), BonJour (2001, 2003a), Brewer (2004, 2011, 2019), Campbell (2002, 2009), Chalmers (1996, 2003, 2007, 2010), Coleman (2019), DePoe (2011, 2012, 2018), Dickie (2010), Dickinson (2019), Duncan (2015, 2017, 2018a, 2018b, 2020, forthcoming), Fales (1996), Fish (2009), Fumerton (1995, 2001, 2005, 2019), Gertler (2001, 2011, 2012), Giustina (forthcoming), Goff (2015), Graham and Horgan (2000), Hasan (2011, 2013a, 2013b), Hellie (2007, 2010), Howell (2013), Levine (2006, 2008, 2010, 2019a, 2019b), Lund (1994, 2005, 2014), McDowell (1986), McGinn (1996, 2008), McGrew (1995, 1999), Moser (1989, 2009), Nida‐Rümelin (1995, 1998, 2007), Pautz (2007, 2017), Pitt (2004, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergmann (2006, §1) appeals to a similar argument to criticize epistemic internalism (which many classical foundationalists accept). See DePoe (2012) and Hasan (2011) for acquaintance‐friendly responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%