2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13138-016-0106-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bereichsspezifische Beliefs zur Schulanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we are particularly interested in domain-specific beliefs (i.e., those that refer to a specific mathematical domain -in our case, calculus). The basis for our work can be traced back to the article "Domain-Specific Beliefs of School Calculus" by Witzke and Spies (2016). In this article, the authors discussed, among other things, that some domain-specific beliefs in school calculus are more dominant than others, according to the way calculus is taught at school and the way students receive and construct the knowledge.…”
Section: Beliefs For Enabling Perspectives On Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we are particularly interested in domain-specific beliefs (i.e., those that refer to a specific mathematical domain -in our case, calculus). The basis for our work can be traced back to the article "Domain-Specific Beliefs of School Calculus" by Witzke and Spies (2016). In this article, the authors discussed, among other things, that some domain-specific beliefs in school calculus are more dominant than others, according to the way calculus is taught at school and the way students receive and construct the knowledge.…”
Section: Beliefs For Enabling Perspectives On Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content is structured in terms of typical belief systems of mathematics according to different educational perspectives on calculus, namely, the formal-abstract perspective, the empirical-concrete perspective, the "toolbox" perspective, and the application perspective. These four perspectives are the result of a reduction of the orientations mentioned in the study by Witzke and Spies (2016) -the logical-structural orientation and the abstract-terminological orientation merge into the formal-abstract perspective, and the toolbox orientation and the symbolic orientation form the "toolbox" perspective. This is a subjective selection from the perspective of the authors of this paper, based on their experience with calculus teaching.…”
Section: Structure Of the Seminar And The Bookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a lot of different descriptions and definitions of the belief concept in literature (Goldin, 2003;Green, 1971;Grigutsch, Raatz & Törner, 1998;Pajares, 1992;Schoenfeld, 1985;Stoffels, 2020;Thompson, 1992), furthermore a lot of research works mention that there is no consent on a definition of belief (Bräunling, 2017;Pehkonen, 1995;Rolka, 2006). Still, there seems to be no satisfactory answer to these theoretical problems; instead, a lot of research dealing with beliefs focus on exploring beliefs of different bearer groups, e.g., teachers and students (Törner, 2018), or the diversity of beliefs in different mathematical fields, establishing the concept of domain-specific beliefs (Eichler & Erens, 2015;Witzke & Spies, 2016).…”
Section: How To Frame (Researchers') Beliefs: Interaction Vs Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on beliefs of school-calculus, Witzke and Spies (2016) were able to show that concepts such as continuity or differentiability are rarely used and understood by students. The development of such concepts can be supported by the 'embodied approach to the calculus' described by Tall (2013).…”
Section: The Software Graph Printer and 3d-printed Graphs Of Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%