Bereavement care interventions and outcome criteria planned by community nurses in the Canary Islands

Secondary use of standardized nursing care data for advancing nursing science and practice: a systematic review

“…The remaining studies (30 of 45, 67%) applied descriptive statistics and other statistical methods specified in Table 2. At least 9 (30%) of 30 studies used only chi-square or t tests 26,28,29,[34][35][36]39,45,69 ; meanwhile, other studies from the 30 used a combination of these basic tests and more complex methods such as data mining, 37,38,40,41,43,56,57 logistic regression, 33,41,43,47,54,56,57 analysis of Table 3. Summary of predictors and outcomes for included studies that measured impact of nursing care…”

“…We observed that, although distinct, these terminologies structured the nursing care plans in the same manner across EHRs, which enabled easy retrieval and analyses of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes for different groups of patients. Additionally, the use of SNTs to code nursing care plans supported the analysis of data from multiple institutions (eg, 105 primary health-care centers) 28,36 and from distinct healthcare practices, such as 2 primary healthcare centers and a hospital. 27 We synthesized foci of included studies into the following categories: (1) feasibility of standardizing nursing data, (2) characterization of nursing care, and (3) impact of nursing care.…”

“…There was no study that analyzed nursing data coded with CCC or PNDS. Twenty-six (58%) studies analyzed nursing data coded with NANDA-I, [26][27][28] NOC, 29,30 NIC, [31][32][33] a combination of these terminologies (eg, NIC and NOC), [34][35][36] or the NNN set. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] Fourteen (31%) studies used Omaha System, [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] while 4 (9%) used ICNP.…”

“…Ten of 16 (63%) studies described the most common nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes for patients with heart failure 48,67 ; older patients with pneumonia 49 ; younger patients with dehydration 35 ; obstetric patients 51 ; low-and high-risk groups 55 ; infants with low birth weight 60 ; patients with cancer 69 ; patients with pressure ulcers 66 ; and patients with pneumonia, total hip or knee replacement, or heart failure. 29 In 6 of 16 (37%) studies, researchers explored interactions between nursing diagnoses, interventions, or outcomes with patient's age and sex 27,28,36 ; patient's age and length of stay 34 ; medical diagnoses and hospital characteristics 26 ; and number of home-visits performed by nurses, patient's age, and race. 63 Impact of nursing care Twenty of 45 (44%) studies measured the impact or effectiveness of nursing care.…”

“…26,[31][32][33]45,46,57,67 The majority (16 of 30, 53%) of studies analyzed care plans and other nursing data. 28,30,[36][37][38][39][40][41]43,44,47,54,59,[63][64][65] Table 2 shows 22 SNT-coded nursing datasets. Ten (45%) of 22 were retrieved from at least 2 different institutions/clinics.…”