In tests of vaginal cornification, anti-oestrogenic activity has been demonstrated in dimethylstilboestrol, ethylstilboestrol and n-propylstilboestrol. It has not been detected in some other stilboestrols.Dimethylstilboestrol, the most potent anti-oestrogen, inhibits the increase in vaginal mitosis and epithelial thickness which normally follows the administration of oestrone to the ovariectomized mouse. This contrasts with the action of substances like testosterone and progesterone, which inhibit cornification but do not inhibit mitosis in ratios of up to a million to one.Recently Emmens & Cox [1958] demonstrated that dimethylstilboestrol inhibits the response of ovariectomized mice to natural and synthetic oestrogens. Oestradiol or oestrone are more strongly inhibited in vaginal smear tests than is diethylstilboestrol, but such inhibition has so far been demonstrated only in intra vaginal tests. Since dimethylstilboestrol is a pro-oestrogen [Emmens, 1942], and detectable inhibition of oestradiol occurs with a dose of about 0-5 % or even lower of the oestrogenic median effective dose (m.e.d.), it was suggested that the untransformed molecule is the inhibitor.Emmens & Cox [1958] discussed other relevant work on oestrogen antagonists, concluding that no other inhibition described seems to be of the same nature as that seen in the case of dimethylstilboestrol. Since then, a note by Chen [1958] describing anti-oestrogenic properties of some compounds of the oestrane series ' at the 5 µg level ' and a paper by Drill & Riegel [1958] on similar properties in some other steroids have appeared. Most of the latter work is concerned with uterine responses and is related to the 'impeded' oestrogens of Huggins & Jensen [1955], the relation of which to the compounds used in the present investigations is not clear. Thus, oestrogens such as oestriol are described as oestrogen antagonists, whereas in many other tests they behave as oestrogens and exhibit little or no antagonism [cf. Claringbold, 1955]. In tests based on uterine responses it is additionally difficult to be sure that pituitary suppression is not involved, rather than direct oestrogen antagonism.In this paper, earlier results are extended to include other members of the stilboestrol series and to derivatives of dimethylstilboestrol. Another test method of high sensitivity and specificity recently developed in this laboratory [Martin & Claringbold, 1958] has also been employed to examine the inhibition of vaginal responses.