1957
DOI: 10.1007/bf01336928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

�ber den Nachweis einzelner Elektronenlawinen und ihrer Sekund�rprozesse in Gasen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that the secondary process is a photoelectric one over the range of E/N covered in the present measurements. Previous studies of electron-avalanche current pulses (Vogel 1957, Vogel and Raether 1957, Schmidt-Tiedemann 1958 have shown that a positive-ion secondary process can occur with a freshly reduced cathode, but that it disappears after about an hour's exposure of the cathode to oxygen, leaving a photoelectric process as the only one normally operative. There is therefore no direct evidence to support the suggestion, made by Dutton et a1 (1967) and by Freely and Fisher (1964), that a positive-ion process operates at the higher values of E/N, where w/X changes relatively slowly with E/N.…”
Section: Observations Of Prebreakdown Current Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the secondary process is a photoelectric one over the range of E/N covered in the present measurements. Previous studies of electron-avalanche current pulses (Vogel 1957, Vogel and Raether 1957, Schmidt-Tiedemann 1958 have shown that a positive-ion secondary process can occur with a freshly reduced cathode, but that it disappears after about an hour's exposure of the cathode to oxygen, leaving a photoelectric process as the only one normally operative. There is therefore no direct evidence to support the suggestion, made by Dutton et a1 (1967) and by Freely and Fisher (1964), that a positive-ion process operates at the higher values of E/N, where w/X changes relatively slowly with E/N.…”
Section: Observations Of Prebreakdown Current Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%