2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BeppoSAX observations of the three Gamma-ray pulsars PSR B0656+14, PSR B1055-52 and PSR B1706-44

Abstract: Abstract.We report the results of the observations of the three γ-ray pulsars PSR B0656+14, PSR B1055−52 and PSR B1706−44 performed with BeppoSAX. We detected a pulsed emission only for PSR B1055−52: in the range 0.1-6.5 keV the pulse profile is sinusoidal and the statistical significance is 4.5σ. The pulsed fraction was estimated 0.64 ± 0.17. This pulsation was detected also at energies greater than 2.5 keV suggesting either a non-thermal origin or a quite high temperature region on the neutron star surface. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of observable X-ray emission below about 0.5 keV due to interstellar absorption means that the electrons producing the observed X-rays have somewhat higher energy than those producing TeV γ-rays, and an extrapolation of the X-ray spectrum to lower energies is necessary. The spectral index measured with ASCA, Γ = 1.7 +0.5 −0.4 , is fully compatible with the more precise determination from BeppoSAX, Γ = 1.69 ± 0.29 (Mineo et al 2002). The derived lower limit on the magnetic field strength is then about 1 µG when one assumes that the inverse Compton scattering involves only the photons of the microwave background radiation and assuming the same photon index in the X-ray and TeV band.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The lack of observable X-ray emission below about 0.5 keV due to interstellar absorption means that the electrons producing the observed X-rays have somewhat higher energy than those producing TeV γ-rays, and an extrapolation of the X-ray spectrum to lower energies is necessary. The spectral index measured with ASCA, Γ = 1.7 +0.5 −0.4 , is fully compatible with the more precise determination from BeppoSAX, Γ = 1.69 ± 0.29 (Mineo et al 2002). The derived lower limit on the magnetic field strength is then about 1 µG when one assumes that the inverse Compton scattering involves only the photons of the microwave background radiation and assuming the same photon index in the X-ray and TeV band.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Attributing a typical error bar (at the 90% confidence level) derived from the observations of the same source somewhat earlier (G. G. Pavlov & M. Teter 2002, private communication) we have T ∞ eff = (60 ± 6) eV. An analysis of the recent BeppoSAX observations of PSR B1055−52 gives T ∞ eff = (75 ± 6) eV (Mineo et al 2002) at the 68% confidence level. We adopt, somewhat arbitrarily, a wide T ∞ eff interval from 54 eV (the minimum value from the Chandra data) to 81 eV (the maximum value from the BeppoSAX data).…”
Section: Very Slowly Cooling Low-mass Nsssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The results of different groups are not fully consistent because of the complexity of observations and their interpretation. For instance, according to G. G. Pavlov (2002, private communication), the best-fit value obtained from the recent Chandra observations of PSR B1055À52 is T (Mineo et al 2002) at the 68% confidence level. We adopt, somewhat arbitrarily, a wide T 1 eff interval from 54 eV (the minimum value from the Chandra data) to 81 eV (the maximum value from the BeppoSAX data).…”
Section: Very Slowly Cooling Low-mass Nssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the stellar radius PSR B0656+14 has been extensively studied at optical (Shearer et al 1997;Kurt et al 1998;Koptsevich et al 2001), ultraviolet (Pavlov, Stringfellow, & Córdova 1996;Pavlov, Welty, & Córdova 1997;Edelstein et al 2000), x-ray (Córdova et al 1989;Finley, Ögelman, & Kiziloglu 1992;Anderson et al 1993;Greiveldinger et al 1996;Mineo et al 2002;Marshall & Schulz 2002;Pavlov et al 2002), and gamma-ray (Ramanamurthy et al 1996) energies.…”
Section: Implications For Thermal Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%