2010
DOI: 10.1899/09-026.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar high reliance of aquatic consumers on allochthonous organic carbon was reported for oligotrophic lakes (Carpenter et al, 2005;Grey, Jones, & Sleep, 2000;Northington et al, 2010), leading to the conclusion by Berggren et al (2010) that efficient bacterial trophic repackaging was an important process during period of high allochthonous reliance of aquatic consumers. Since similar observations were reported for Lake Tollari (Figure 4 and Belle, Poska, et al, 2017), these findings confirm that allochthonous organic matter can become an important carbon source for aquatic consumers during periods of low in-lake primary production.…”
Section: Carbon Processing In Benthic Food Webs and Climate Changesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similar high reliance of aquatic consumers on allochthonous organic carbon was reported for oligotrophic lakes (Carpenter et al, 2005;Grey, Jones, & Sleep, 2000;Northington et al, 2010), leading to the conclusion by Berggren et al (2010) that efficient bacterial trophic repackaging was an important process during period of high allochthonous reliance of aquatic consumers. Since similar observations were reported for Lake Tollari (Figure 4 and Belle, Poska, et al, 2017), these findings confirm that allochthonous organic matter can become an important carbon source for aquatic consumers during periods of low in-lake primary production.…”
Section: Carbon Processing In Benthic Food Webs and Climate Changesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In lakes with low hypolimnetic DO, δ 13 C of larval Chironomini is lower than in larger lakes with high hypolimnetic DO, suggesting that use of methane‐derived carbon (MDC) is greater under hypoxic conditions (Hershey et al ). Furthermore, benthic secondary production in some of these lakes is very high, ranging from one gram dry mass m −2 yr −1 to 20.55 g dry mass m −2 yr −1 , higher than would be expected if it was supported only by autochthonous primary production (Northington et al ). Gentzel et al () found that the ratio of MOB : methanogen DNA on tubes compared to that in the sediment supported the hypothesis of microbial gardening of MOB in an hypoxic zone where the rate of CH 4 efflux was relatively high, but not in a well‐oxygenated zone, where CH 4 efflux was low.…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While some zoobenthos can and do rely on benthic primary production (Strayer and Likens ; Hecky and Hesslein ; Devlin et al ; Lau et al ), others employ a diversity of other feeding strategies (Cummins and Klug ) and can feed on resources such as terrestrial particulates, settling phytoplankton and other animals (Merritt et al ). In a survey of eight oligotrophic Arctic lakes, Northington et al () found only a weak relationship between zoobenthos production and benthic primary production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%