2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic Prokaryotic Community Response to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Chronic Exposure: Importance of Emission Sources in Mediterranean Ports

Abstract: The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) produced by multiple emission sources on prokaryotic communities in sediments chronically affected by anthropogenic pressures. In this context, surface sediments were investigated in three Mediterranean touristic ports over three sampling periods and in different port sectors. The levels of 16 priority PAHs varied over three orders of magnitude (25-49,000 ng g −1) covering the range of concentrations previously reported f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of 31 individual aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHs) in the range C10-C40, Unresolved Complex Mixture (UCM), and 16 US EPA priority PAHs in superficial sediments were previously evaluated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in Chatzinikolaou et al (2018) and Vitali et al (2019). Abbreviations for the 16-EPA priority PAHs are as follows: 2-ring PAH -naphthalene (Naph); 3-ring PAHs -acenaphthylene (Aceph), acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Fl), phenanthrene (Phen), anthracene (Ant); 4-ring PAHs -fluoranthene (Flu), pyrene (Pyr), benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), chrysene (Chr); 5-ring PAHs -benzo [b] [a,h]anthracene (DBA).…”
Section: Study Sites and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Concentrations of 31 individual aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHs) in the range C10-C40, Unresolved Complex Mixture (UCM), and 16 US EPA priority PAHs in superficial sediments were previously evaluated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in Chatzinikolaou et al (2018) and Vitali et al (2019). Abbreviations for the 16-EPA priority PAHs are as follows: 2-ring PAH -naphthalene (Naph); 3-ring PAHs -acenaphthylene (Aceph), acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Fl), phenanthrene (Phen), anthracene (Ant); 4-ring PAHs -fluoranthene (Flu), pyrene (Pyr), benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), chrysene (Chr); 5-ring PAHs -benzo [b] [a,h]anthracene (DBA).…”
Section: Study Sites and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations for the 16-EPA priority PAHs are as follows: 2-ring PAH -naphthalene (Naph); 3-ring PAHs -acenaphthylene (Aceph), acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Fl), phenanthrene (Phen), anthracene (Ant); 4-ring PAHs -fluoranthene (Flu), pyrene (Pyr), benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), chrysene (Chr); 5-ring PAHs -benzo [b] [a,h]anthracene (DBA). The following hydrocarbon pollution descriptors were used: (i) the total level of AHs, calculated as the sum of individual compounds in the range C10-C40, (ii) the sum of four low-molecular-weight PAHs (Phen, Ant, Flu, Pyr, LPAHs) and the sum of eight high-molecular-weight (BaA, Chr, BbF, BkF, BaP, Inp, BgP, DBA, HPAHs) as descriptors of PAH pollution levels; (iii) the molar ratios of selected PAHs ( LPAH/ HPAH, Ant/Ant + Phen, Flu/Flu + Pyr, BaA/BaA + Chr, Inp/Inp + BgP), as descriptors of PAH sources (Vitali et al, 2019).…”
Section: Study Sites and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations