2007
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200610991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic Invertebrates in Karst Springs: Does Substratum or Location Define Communities?

Abstract: Only a few studies to-date have dealt with the habitat preferences of the fauna of springs. The main objective of our study was to fill this gap. The research was carried out in springs situated in the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland, Poland. The benthic fauna was collected from fine and coarse substrata using a typical hydrobiological approach. Forty-nine families or subfamilies and four higher taxa (Hydrozoa, Turbellaria, Nematoda, Hydracarina) were found in the springs studied. Invertebrates collected in springs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Wyżga et al (2002), the presence of rocky material of high granulity, as well as wood debris favours the accumulation of muddy sediments, fallen leaves and thus creates favourable living conditions for many species. This was also confirmed by research done by Dumnicka et al (2007). Only at the bottom of evorsion potholes, directly downstream from the hydrological structures, rock material was sorted out and small, which reflected negatively on habitat conditions, making them unfavourable for the development of benthic forms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Wyżga et al (2002), the presence of rocky material of high granulity, as well as wood debris favours the accumulation of muddy sediments, fallen leaves and thus creates favourable living conditions for many species. This was also confirmed by research done by Dumnicka et al (2007). Only at the bottom of evorsion potholes, directly downstream from the hydrological structures, rock material was sorted out and small, which reflected negatively on habitat conditions, making them unfavourable for the development of benthic forms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Changes in abiotic and anthropogenic factors, caused by the presence of hydrological structures, affect in various ways individual hydrobiont groupings. Hydromorphological changes in a regulated watercourse usually cause species depletion in a particular biocenose (Dukowska, Grzybkowska, 2007;Kukuła, Bylak, 2011). The presence of lateral hydrological structures, even those of relatively small sizes, is important in the context of some benthic invertebrates travelling upstream (Błachuta et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landscape factors most used in similar studies of macroinvertebrate fauna in springs were altitude, the type and the structure of the landscape, and how it is used, and the proximity of nearby water bodies (Křoupalová et al, 2011;Dumnicka et al, 2007;Martin and Brunke, 2012;Pakulnicka et al, 2016;Stryjecki et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a longer preexposure in the stream was undesired because the leaf litter would have been degraded already before the bags were exposed in the flumes. (iii) Leaf litter bags may not be colonized by taxa which prefer hard substrates; the importance of substratum type on macroinvertebrate density and composition has for example been highlighted by Dumnicka et al (2007). Many of these effects may possibly have been avoided by assisting the colonization of the flumes by adding a standard load of invertebrates obtained from the stream by kick-net sampling (as e.g.…”
Section: Differences In Invertebrate and Periphyton Composition Betwementioning
confidence: 99%