2013
DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.008685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic effects on the polarization of light in shallow waters

Abstract: Measurements of the upwelling polarized radiance in relatively shallow waters of varying depths and benthic conditions are compared to simulations, revealing the depolarizing nature of the seafloor. The simulations, executed with the software package RayXP, are solutions to the vector radiative transfer equation, which depends on the incident light field and three types of parameters: inherent optical properties, the scattering matrix, and the benthic reflectance. These were measured directly or calculated fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matrix is calculated for spherical particles. The polarization elements (F 12 /F 11 , F 33 /F 11 , and F 34 /F 11 ) of the scattering matrix of phytoplankton particles are similar to those obtained for Rayleigh scattering, because the relative refractive index is very low, i.e., 1.06, similar to what was presented in Figure 4 of Gilerson et al (2013). In contrast, the shape of the polarized scattering matrix elements of NAPs are significantly different, due to their high refractive index, with exception of the near forward and backward direction where it exhibits a weak polarization effect according to Mie-Lorenz theory.…”
Section: Single Scattering Propertiessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The matrix is calculated for spherical particles. The polarization elements (F 12 /F 11 , F 33 /F 11 , and F 34 /F 11 ) of the scattering matrix of phytoplankton particles are similar to those obtained for Rayleigh scattering, because the relative refractive index is very low, i.e., 1.06, similar to what was presented in Figure 4 of Gilerson et al (2013). In contrast, the shape of the polarized scattering matrix elements of NAPs are significantly different, due to their high refractive index, with exception of the near forward and backward direction where it exhibits a weak polarization effect according to Mie-Lorenz theory.…”
Section: Single Scattering Propertiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Their conclusion is that Mie scattering cannot reproduce the measured scattering matrix due to the limitations of sphericity assumption. Volten Ottaviani et al, 2018 POLRADS 410, 436, 486, 526, 548, and -Boss et al, 2007;Sullivan and Twardowski, 2009;You et al, 2011;Gilerson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Characterize Hydrosol Scattering Matrix Size Distribution and Refractive Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more refined treatment of the spectral absorption and scattering properties of the water column can be important for assessing camouflage in many ecosystems. In optically shallow waters, for example, reflectance from the seafloor impacts the spectral shape, magnitude, and polarization characteristics of the light field [ 2 ]. Organisms that hide in such environments have to match downwelling light from the sun, as well as upwelling light reflected from the seafloor (sediment, seagrass, corals, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms that hide in such environments have to match downwelling light from the sun, as well as upwelling light reflected from the seafloor (sediment, seagrass, corals, etc.) and often match the polarization conditions that may be visible to certain predators [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation