2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic diatom response to changing environmental conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This feature could decrease the vulnerability of microbial mats to toxic compounds (Sundbäck et al, 2007 and reference therein). Overall, microphytobenthic abundance in the port area was of the same order of magnitude as that previously estimated at a site in the middle of the Gulf of Trieste (Cibic et al, 2012a) but higher than previously reported from the coastal St. C1 (Franzo et al, 2016b). Among the investigated stations, a lower microalgal density was observed at St. 7, approximately half of that obtained at the first four stations, probably because of the greater depth (19.5 m) and lower irradiance at the bottom to support a thriving microbial phototrophic community.…”
Section: Discussion Benthic Trophic Web In the Port Areasupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This feature could decrease the vulnerability of microbial mats to toxic compounds (Sundbäck et al, 2007 and reference therein). Overall, microphytobenthic abundance in the port area was of the same order of magnitude as that previously estimated at a site in the middle of the Gulf of Trieste (Cibic et al, 2012a) but higher than previously reported from the coastal St. C1 (Franzo et al, 2016b). Among the investigated stations, a lower microalgal density was observed at St. 7, approximately half of that obtained at the first four stations, probably because of the greater depth (19.5 m) and lower irradiance at the bottom to support a thriving microbial phototrophic community.…”
Section: Discussion Benthic Trophic Web In the Port Areasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Only cells containing pigments and not empty frustules were counted under a Leitz inverted light microscope (Leica Microsystems AG, Wetzlar, Germany) using a ×32 objective (×320 final magnification). Samples were counted following the protocol described by Cibic et al (2007aCibic et al ( , 2012a. At least 100 cells were counted for each replicate.…”
Section: Microphytobenthos (Mpb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a and 7a). SDF remained the most common trophic trait category, probably due to the even and stable grain size-distribution (Cibic et al, 2012 andFranzo et al, 2016) This is in accordance with Simonini et al (2004); Occhipinti-Ambrogi et al (2005) and Faresi et al (2012), Table 2. who found deposit feeding invertebrates to be numerically dominant in sandy-mud or muddy sediments. Much of the detrital food for these invertebrates is associated with a high proportion of particles within the silt-clay range.…”
Section: Feeding Habits and Reproductive Frequencies In Relation To Fsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…There are increasing numbers of studies documenting the ways that diatoms respond to natural environmental conditions (Serôdio et al 2006, Perkins et al 2010, Cao et al 2011, Cartaxana et al 2011, Coelho et al 2011, Cibic et al 2012, Amin et al 2015, which aid in understanding how these different species-specific responses contribute to overall spatial and temporal changes in diatom abundance in localized ecosystems. Barnett et al (2015) have shown that there is a clear difference in the photo-protective behaviours of motile and non-motile diatoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%