2001
DOI: 10.1078/0344-0338-00112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benign Spindle Cell Tumors of the Mammary Stroma: Diagnostic Criteria, Classification, and Histogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
95
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously reported immunohistochemical profile of spindle cell lipoma has generally included positive staining for CD34 and vimentin and negative staining for S100 (Lombardi et al 1994;Magro et al 2001). In the present study, tumour cells exhibited immunoreactivity to CD34 and vimentin but not to S100.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The previously reported immunohistochemical profile of spindle cell lipoma has generally included positive staining for CD34 and vimentin and negative staining for S100 (Lombardi et al 1994;Magro et al 2001). In the present study, tumour cells exhibited immunoreactivity to CD34 and vimentin but not to S100.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Numerous reports showed that even though extramammary fibromatosis usually exhibit positivity for ER and PR, mammary fibromatosis is consistently devoid of such receptors. 2,8,12 moreover, Devouassoux-Shisheboran et al have shown that cytoplasmic pS2 protein expression, which is induced by estrogen, is consistently negative in their series of 33 cases.…”
Section: Fig 1: Showing Sonomammogrm Of Right Breast Fig 2: Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD34 positivity on fibroblasts is thought to represent an uncommitted cell capable of multidirectional mesenchymal differentiation. 26 Prior studies have also suggested that there is an inverse relationship between myofibroblastic differentiation and CD34 positivity. 27 The presence of CD34 on 75.6% of live harvested uncultured versus 7.84% of cultured fibroblasts suggests that fibroblasts in a nonactivated resting state within the skin dermis have not undergone myofibroblastic differentiation characteristic of the activated phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%