1989
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.4.779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benign prostatic hypertrophy: treatment with a metallic stent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of expandable metallic stents is of great clinical importance in the treatment of vascular6 and biliary stenosis 7, 8. It has been used for benign prostatic hyperplasia9 and urethral strictures10 with poor results. The use of such stents in the treatment of malignant and recurrent benign ureteral obstruction has been limited to experimental studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of expandable metallic stents is of great clinical importance in the treatment of vascular6 and biliary stenosis 7, 8. It has been used for benign prostatic hyperplasia9 and urethral strictures10 with poor results. The use of such stents in the treatment of malignant and recurrent benign ureteral obstruction has been limited to experimental studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gillams et al [ 7] described woven stainless‐steel stents of 9–14 F which were moderately successful and subsequently used in vascular surgery. Early experience in the urinary tract was in the prostatic urethra, with stents made from stainless‐steel [ 8, 9]. Encrustation and urothelial hyperplasia develop rapidly around these devices [ 10]; incorporation of these stents into the urothelium makes removal difficult, a feature substantiated by in vitro studies [ 10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the most important improvements with the present technique are the choice of optimum stent length and the precise placing of the stent, both pivotal factors contributing to successful stenting. In addition, the present technique does not require lumbar anaesthesia, endoscopy or X‐ray fluoroscopy equipment, making stent insertion simpler and less invasive than the conventional method using endoscopy and/or fluoroscopy [2,6,7]. The less‐invasive features of the technique are advantageous, particularly for high‐risk patients.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%