1994
DOI: 10.1080/10575639408043935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bengalensol, a New 16-epicafestol Derivative from the Leaves ofCoffea Bengalensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity was confirmed by UPLC-ToF-MS and NMR experiments. The spectroscopic data were in excellent accordance with the published data . UV (H 2 O/ACN/formic acid 67/32.9/0.1, v/v/v) 280 nm; UPLC-ToF-MS (ESI + ) found m / z 329.1753, calcdd 329.1753 (Δ 0.1 mDa) for C 20 H 25 O 4 ([M + H] + ); 1 H NMR (MeOD, 500 MHz) δ 1.05 (3H, s, H20), 1.33 (1H, m, H12a), 1.50–1.68 (4H, m, H6a, H7a, H15a, H15b), 1.82 (1H, m, H7b), 1.89 (1H, m, H14a), 2.02 (1H, m, H9), 2.08–2.15 (2H, m, H12b, H14b), 2.55–2.57 (2H, m, H1a, H13), 2.66 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H1b), 2.91 (1H, dd, J = 12.2, 2.1 Hz, H5), 3.60 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz, H17a), 3.69 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz, H17b), 4.44 (1H, bs, H11), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H18), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H19); 13 C NMR (MeOD, 125 MHz) δ 16.1 (C20, CH3), 22.2 (C6, CH2), 36.8 (C7, CH2), 40.3 (C14, CH), 42.4 (C13, CH2), 43.3 (C10, C), 43.6 (C12, CH2), 44.7 (C8, C), 45.9 (C5, CH), 52.9 (C15, CH2), 53.9 (C1, CH2), 56.1 (C9, CH), 65.1 (C17, CH2), 77.5 (C11, CH), 90.0 (C16, C), 110.8 (C18, CH), 143.0 (C4, C), 146.0 (C3, C), 149.5 (C19, CH), 186.0 (C2, C).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identity was confirmed by UPLC-ToF-MS and NMR experiments. The spectroscopic data were in excellent accordance with the published data . UV (H 2 O/ACN/formic acid 67/32.9/0.1, v/v/v) 280 nm; UPLC-ToF-MS (ESI + ) found m / z 329.1753, calcdd 329.1753 (Δ 0.1 mDa) for C 20 H 25 O 4 ([M + H] + ); 1 H NMR (MeOD, 500 MHz) δ 1.05 (3H, s, H20), 1.33 (1H, m, H12a), 1.50–1.68 (4H, m, H6a, H7a, H15a, H15b), 1.82 (1H, m, H7b), 1.89 (1H, m, H14a), 2.02 (1H, m, H9), 2.08–2.15 (2H, m, H12b, H14b), 2.55–2.57 (2H, m, H1a, H13), 2.66 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H1b), 2.91 (1H, dd, J = 12.2, 2.1 Hz, H5), 3.60 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz, H17a), 3.69 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz, H17b), 4.44 (1H, bs, H11), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H18), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H19); 13 C NMR (MeOD, 125 MHz) δ 16.1 (C20, CH3), 22.2 (C6, CH2), 36.8 (C7, CH2), 40.3 (C14, CH), 42.4 (C13, CH2), 43.3 (C10, C), 43.6 (C12, CH2), 44.7 (C8, C), 45.9 (C5, CH), 52.9 (C15, CH2), 53.9 (C1, CH2), 56.1 (C9, CH), 65.1 (C17, CH2), 77.5 (C11, CH), 90.0 (C16, C), 110.8 (C18, CH), 143.0 (C4, C), 146.0 (C3, C), 149.5 (C19, CH), 186.0 (C2, C).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The spectroscopic data were in excellent accordance with the published data. 18 UV (H 2 O/ACN/formic acid 67/32.9/0. Functional Calcium Mobilization Assay.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of the glycoside moiety, the connecting carbon C11 (74.5 ppm), and the quaternary carbon C16 (83.8 ppm), the chemical shifts of target compound 3 were in good accordance with those reported for bengalensol, which has been isolated from the leaves of Coffea bengalensis. 20 Considering the glycosidic nature of 3, the HDMS data of both intact and fragmented pseudomolecular ion, and the NMR spectroscopic data, compound 3 was unequivocally identified as the furokaurane glucoside 11-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)-cafestol-2one, also reported as mozambioside (cf. Figure 3), which has been isolated from seeds of C. arabica 21 as well as the wild coffee species Coffea pseudozanguebariae.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven known diterpenoids were also obtained from this genus, bengalensol [18], villanovane [10], tricalysione A [14], 2 β ,16 α ,17-trihydroxy- ent -kauran-19 α -oic acid [19], 2-O-(2-O-isovaleryl- β - d -gluco-pyranosyl)-4 α -atractyligenin [20], 2-O-(2-O-isovaleryl- β - d -gluco-pyranosyl)-4 β -atrac- tyligenin [20], 3-O- β - d -glucopyranosyl-2-O-(2-O-isovaleryl- β - d -gluco-pyranosyl)-4 β -atracty ligenin [20]. Their structures were identified by comparison of their NMR data with literature data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%