“…A small receiver connected to The pedagogical value of clickers in the academic setting has been studied in a diversity of disciplines whose common denominator was a large number of students per section. The vast majority of these studies (Hake, 1998;Burnstein and Lederman, 2001;Jones, et al, 2001;Elliott, 2003;Wit, 2003;Draper and Brown, 2004;Kennedy and Cutts, 2005;Beekes, 2006Beekes, , 2009Bunce, et al, 2006;Ewing, 2006;Freeman, et al, 2006Freeman, et al, , 2007Lee and Bainum, 2006;Narloch, et al, 2006;Poirier and Feldman, 2007;Stowell and Nelson, 2007;Cotner, et al, 2008;King and Joshi, 2008;Morling, et al, 2008;Gier and Kreiner, 2009;Mayer, et al, 2009;Marlow, 2010) provide converging evidence that students as well as professors agree that clickers afford the following benefits: a) they increase motivation and interest for the class, b) they increase participation and involvement, c) they allow students to self-assess and compare their performance to the rest of the class, d) they provide immediate feedback, e) they are easy and fun to use, f) they can provide anonymity of the students' response, and, more importantly, g) they are believed to contribute to learning. This short outline of the many benefits for using clickers should be enough to justify their embracing; however, a recurrent limitation from many of these studies is that they simply rely on qualitative methods such as questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations.…”