2016
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0117.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of Increasing the Model Resolution for the Seasonal Forecast Quality in EC-Earth

Abstract: Resolution in climate models is thought to be an important factor for advancing seasonal prediction capability. To test this hypothesis, seasonal ensemble reforecasts are conducted over 1993-2009 with the European community model EC-Earth in three configurations: standard resolution (;18 and ;60 km in the ocean and atmosphere models, respectively), intermediate resolution (;0.258 and ;60 km), and high resolution (;0.258 and ;39 km), the two latter configurations being used without any specific tuning. The mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operational seasonal prediction systems are now being at resolutions well beyond one degree (e.g., MacLachlan et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2018). The effects on prediction skill from further increases in resolution in the atmosphere (e.g., Jung et al, 2012;Jia et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2015;Prodhomme et al, 2016) or ocean (e.g., Kirtman et al, 2017) is an active research topic and it is not known whether this outweighs the benefits of larger ensemble size (e.g., Scaife et al, 2014;Doi et al, 2019), increased vertical resolution (e.g., Marshall and Scaife, 2010;Butler et al, 2016) or improved initial conditions (e.g., Kumar et al, 2015;Nie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operational seasonal prediction systems are now being at resolutions well beyond one degree (e.g., MacLachlan et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2018). The effects on prediction skill from further increases in resolution in the atmosphere (e.g., Jung et al, 2012;Jia et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2015;Prodhomme et al, 2016) or ocean (e.g., Kirtman et al, 2017) is an active research topic and it is not known whether this outweighs the benefits of larger ensemble size (e.g., Scaife et al, 2014;Doi et al, 2019), increased vertical resolution (e.g., Marshall and Scaife, 2010;Butler et al, 2016) or improved initial conditions (e.g., Kumar et al, 2015;Nie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions are rarely assessed and individual studies suggest that observational uncertainties might be larger than anticipated (e.g. Addor and Fischer 2015;Prodhomme et al 2016;Massonnet et al 2016). Formal concepts of how to account for observational uncertainties provided by ORs in climate model evaluation are, however, still scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an atmospheric resolution of T63L47 (about 1.875 • horizontal grid spacing) and an oceanic resolution of 1.5 • L40 the MPI-ESM-LR decadal prediction system applied in the first phase of MiKlip has a rather moderate spatial resolution. Meanwhile, studies using higher-resolution forecast systems are available, for instance Monerie et al (2017) using 0.5 • grid spacing in the atmosphere and 0.25 • in the ocean and Robson et al (2018) using ∼ 0.9 • in the atmosphere and 0.25 • in the ocean. They focus on oceanic parameters and find skill, e.g., for SSTs, sea ice extent and ocean heat content, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%