Handbook of Plant Biotechnology 2004
DOI: 10.1002/0470869143.kc062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of Commercialised Biotechnology‐Derived Crops in the United States

Abstract: This chapter examines the importance of pest management in crop production and details the commercially available biotechnology‐derived traits and the need for them in the context of available pest management options in conventional crops. The discussion is mainly focused on the actual and potential benefits of this innovation for crops commercialised so far in the United States. Economic advantage to growers is the ultimate key factor, which determines the adoption and success of biotechnology‐derived crops. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, NCFAP has predicted the potential impacts of adoption of other, not yet commercialized transgenic crops on pesticide use in Europe and the USA. For example, the actual US data of 2004 included herbicide‐resistant canola, cotton, maize and soybean, as well as insect‐resistant cotton and maize 15. The surveys consider the crop protection practices on transgenic crops and possible alternatives for conventional crops in the same year.…”
Section: Altered Pesticide Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, NCFAP has predicted the potential impacts of adoption of other, not yet commercialized transgenic crops on pesticide use in Europe and the USA. For example, the actual US data of 2004 included herbicide‐resistant canola, cotton, maize and soybean, as well as insect‐resistant cotton and maize 15. The surveys consider the crop protection practices on transgenic crops and possible alternatives for conventional crops in the same year.…”
Section: Altered Pesticide Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysts assessing the impacts of Bt crops on insecticide use report reductions, or displacement, in the range of 25% to 50% per hectare [6]. A more recent study reports a 24% reduction [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of unpublished simulation studies have been carried out by the National Center for Food and Agriculture Policy (NCFAP). In a report covering crop year 2005, NCFAP projected that HR corn, soybean, and cotton reduced total herbicide use by 25.6 million kgs, compared to hectares planted to non-HR varieties [6]. Sankula's herbicide use estimates are based on observations of mostly university experts regarding "typical" herbicide use rates on farms planting HR versus non-HR varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been used by others (Sankula and Blumenthal, 2003; Sankula and Blumenthal, 2006; Johnson and Strom, 2007). It also has the advantage of providing comparisons of current crop protection practices on both GM crops and the conventional alternatives and so takes into account dynamic changes in crop protection management practices and technologies rather than making comparisons solely on past practices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%