2004
DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.4.470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of Adding a Drug to a Single-Agent or a 2-Agent Chemotherapy Regimen in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
169
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
169
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Several randomized studies [9 -13], as well as two independent meta-analyses [14,15], have consistently shown that two-drug regimens provide superior response and survival rates compared with monotherapy, whereas threedrug combinations may improve the objective response rate (ORR) but do not yield any survival benefit and are associated with greater toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several randomized studies [9 -13], as well as two independent meta-analyses [14,15], have consistently shown that two-drug regimens provide superior response and survival rates compared with monotherapy, whereas threedrug combinations may improve the objective response rate (ORR) but do not yield any survival benefit and are associated with greater toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotherapy is a mainstay of treatment in the majority of patients. At present, a twodrug regimen consisting of a platinum agent is regarded standard treatment for adults with good performance status (Delbaldo et al, 2004;Pfister et al, 2004), resulting in an extremely toxic physiologic environment and placing patients at high risk for adverse events. Chemotherapy induced leucopenia (CIL) is a common and significant adverse effect of chemotherapy, defined as a leucopenia count of <4.00×10 9 /L, and it can put patients at risk for severe infection (Lyman et al, 2010;Lyman and Kleiner, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotherapy induced leucopenia (CIL) is a common and significant adverse effect of chemotherapy, defined as a leucopenia count of <4.00×10 9 /L, and it can put patients at risk for severe infection (Lyman et al, 2010;Lyman and Kleiner, 2011). It is also the major dose-limiting toxicity, and it is frequently managed by reducing or delaying the chemotherapy (Delbaldo et al, 2004;Hangaishi, 2011;Saloustros et al, 2011), which can result in lower diseasefree and overall survival (Kvinnsland et al, 1999;Gurney Schiller et al, 2002;Pfister et al, 2004), However, research (Shitara et al, 2011) on breast cancer (Saarto et al, 1997;Poikonen et al, 1999;Cameron et al, 2003;Shitara et al, 2010;Han et al, 2012), small-cell lung cancer (Banerji et al, 2006), osteosarcoma (Ratain, 1998), ovarian cancer (Sawyer and Ratain., 2001) have shown the association between chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and better clinical outcome for patients. It is not associated with increased risk for death (Souza-Dantas et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-platinum combinations can also provide modest survival benefits and improvements in quality of life, but these combinations have yet to be broadly accepted (Georgoulias et al, 2005;Treat et al, 2005;Takeda et al, 2009). During the past few years, several novel drugs including paclitaxel, docetaxel, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, erlotinib, gefitinib have shown significant activity against NSCLC (Shepherd et al, 1993;Walling et al, 1994;Fosella et al, 2000;Smit et al, 2003;Delbaldo et al, 2004;Huang et al, 2008;Kosmidis et al, 2008;Di et al, 2010;Klastersky et al, 2012). As a single agent in advanced NSCLC, gemcitabine has produced response rates of between 20% and 28% and survivals between 7 and 11 months (Anderson et al, 1994;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%