2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of a fungal endophyte in Elymus virginicus decline under drought stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, endophyte infection increased shoot biomass significantly more in fertilized treatment than in the unfertilized treatment. These findings are in agreement with the previous reports on the agronomically important turf grass, tall fescue (Arachevaleta et al 1989;Malinowski and Belesky 2000), and in native grasses (Rudgers and Swafford 2009). In contrast, these results differ from those obtained in Danthonia spicata and Arizona fescue, in which EI plants had a performance disadvantage relative to EF plants under well-watered fertilized (HH) conditions (McCormick et al 2001;Faeth et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, endophyte infection increased shoot biomass significantly more in fertilized treatment than in the unfertilized treatment. These findings are in agreement with the previous reports on the agronomically important turf grass, tall fescue (Arachevaleta et al 1989;Malinowski and Belesky 2000), and in native grasses (Rudgers and Swafford 2009). In contrast, these results differ from those obtained in Danthonia spicata and Arizona fescue, in which EI plants had a performance disadvantage relative to EF plants under well-watered fertilized (HH) conditions (McCormick et al 2001;Faeth et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Morse et al (2002) found that in Arizona fescue (Festuca arizonica Vasey) endophyte infection was beneficial to host performance under low water availability. Rudgers and Swafford (2009) have reported that the benefits of a fungal endophyte declined under drought stress in Elymus virginicus L. In contrast, no benefits of endophyte infection for Festuca rubra L. and F. pratensis Huds. were found under drought stress (Ahlholm et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We noted above that a grass was only half as much affected by drought if colonised by an endophyte (Rudgers and Swafford 2009). Indeed endophytes may confer both abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in grasses, including cereals, and this feature could be targeted as a breeding objective (Newton et al 2010a).…”
Section: Managing Crop Systems For Resiliencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, we should also consider the role of other organisms in the crop environment or within the crop itself. For example, the grass Elymus virginicus was only half as much affected by drought if infected with an endophyte Epichloe elymi (Rudgers and Swafford 2009). Endophytes have largely been excluded by the approaches used in major crop breeding programs as well as common agronomic practices.…”
Section: Water Other Effects and Extremesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endophyte disinfection was achieved by heating a subset of seeds to 60°C in a convection oven for 7 d (see also Rudgers and Swafford 2009). Control seeds were placed at room temperature during this period.…”
Section: Endophyte Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%