2016
DOI: 10.7249/wr1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits and Earnings Losses for Permanently Disabled Workers in California: Trends Through the Great Recession and Impacts of Recent Reforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An ex ante evaluation of the RTWSP's impact on benefit adequacy and equity was included in the wage loss study by Dworsky et al (2016). The authors found that the value of the RTWSP for the average worker with PD would be modest in comparison to the other benefit hikes included in SB 863 and that impacts on either vertical or horizontal equity would be muted.…”
Section: Anticipated Effects Of the Return-to-work Supplement Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An ex ante evaluation of the RTWSP's impact on benefit adequacy and equity was included in the wage loss study by Dworsky et al (2016). The authors found that the value of the RTWSP for the average worker with PD would be modest in comparison to the other benefit hikes included in SB 863 and that impacts on either vertical or horizontal equity would be muted.…”
Section: Anticipated Effects Of the Return-to-work Supplement Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this decline in PD ratings and PPD benefits, the proportion of lost earnings that was replaced by PPD benefits (i.e., the wage replacement rate) fell by 26 percent in the three years after the reforms (Seabury et al, 2011). Wage replacement rates for permanently disabled workers dropped even more sharply after the Great Recession of 2008-2009 and California's slow labor market recovery made it even more difficult for disabled workers to return to work or find new employment following injury (Dworsky et al, 2016).…”
Section: Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations