Benefits and barriers in a clinical research competency development scheme for low- and middle-income countries

Casamitjana, Núria; Vahedi, Mahnaz; Davoren, Sarah; Kavoura, Eleni; Tallada, Joan; Yamaka, Sara; Launois, Pascal

doi:10.1080/16549716.2022.2035504

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Siedlecki and Albert ( 2020 ) do however caution that removal of the barriers does not guarantee an increase in research activities; clarity regarding the understanding of clinical scholarship is needed and attention should be a given to ensuring that the elements and qualities of a clinical scholar is clear to nurses. Casamitjana et al ( 2022 ) also suggest that in order to achieve scientific equity in health research, gaps in individual and institutional capacity and infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries must be addressed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service

Almaze¹,

Emmamally²,

Brysiewicz³

2023

Curationis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Clinical scholarship is defined as an approach that enables evidence-based nursing and the development of best practices to meet the needs of clients efficiently and effectively. However, there are many barriers that impede its progress. Objective This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service areas. Method This multimethods study used a structured questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews of post basic nursing students and their lecturers (nurse educators). Results The 81 students who completed the questionnaire indicated a lack of support or funding assistance and mentoring, as well as no mechanisms to reward or recognise scholarship as top barriers to clinical scholarship. Top enablers were noticed as reward mechanisms in place, more protected time and availability of role models and mentoring. Twelve respondents engaged in the qualitative phase and three categories emerged from the data, namely (1) resource dependent, (2) ‘what’s the use of research’, (3) making a change. Conclusion It has been shown that there is a need to adopt and promote a culture of clinical scholarship to ensure that the best available evidence is being utilised by nurses to effectively manage their patients; however, to support clinical scholarship, resources are needed. Contribution This study highlighted the lack of funding and resources as being a major barrier to scholarship, together with an institutional culture that did not promote clinical scholarship. Providing protected time, mentoring and criteria for promotion and reward based on scholarship is viewed as enabling.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service

Almaze¹,

Emmamally²,

Brysiewicz³

2023

Curationis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unravelling the complexity of research capacity strengthening for health professionals in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A concept analysis

Buser,

Capellari,

Wondafrash

et al. 2024

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimsResearch capacity strengthening (RCS) is crucial in enhancing healthcare outcomes, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), which face challenges due to limited resources, unequal access to care and the need for evidence‐based decision‐making. We seek to move beyond a surface‐level understanding of RCS, unearthing the core attributes, the factors that precede its implementation and the transformative outcomes it generates within the LMIC healthcare landscape.DesignThis study employs the Walker and Avant approach to concept analysis to comprehensively explore the dimensions and attributes of RCS as it pertains to allied and public health professionals in LMICs, propose empirical referents and suggest an operational definition.Data SourcesOvid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to 27 July 2023, to identify studies on RCS in LMICs. The Walker and Avant approach to concept analysis was selected because it provides a framework for systematically examining and clarifying the meaning and implications of RCS. This method involves a structured process of defining RCS, identifying its attributes, antecedents, consequences and cases, and ultimately providing a clear understanding of its meaning and implications. Identifying empirical referents offers measurable indicators that researchers and policymakers can use to assess the effectiveness of RCS initiatives in LMICs.ConclusionRCS for health professionals in LMICs involves a sustainable process that equips them with essential research skills, fostering the ability to conduct high‐quality research and improve healthcare delivery in resource‐constrained settings.ImplicationsRCS aims to empower health professionals to apply evidence‐based practices, reduce disparities and enhance the well‐being of populations in LMICs.ImpactUltimately, a concept analysis of RCS empowers us to harness the full potential of research to enhance healthcare delivery, improve patient outcomes and advance the well‐being of populations worldwide.

show abstract

Benefits and barriers in a clinical research competency development scheme for low- and middle-income countries

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service

Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service

Unravelling the complexity of research capacity strengthening for health professionals in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A concept analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About