2016
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00175-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit of treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in individual patients

Abstract: We read with interest the correspondence by K. Fluegge, which discusses inclusion of additional information in our recently published decision aid for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) [1]. K. Fluegge suggests that the dynamic robustness of the decision aid could be strengthened by including information on 1) treatment adherence, 2) transitional alternative treatment regimens (e.g. transition from isoniazid to rifampicin after adverse events) and 3) ethnicity (as an indicator of tolerability to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined a country of origin as having a high TB burden if it had a TB incidence >200/100 000 people, and limited this potential screening population to people migrating to BC at age ≤50 years. We selected these age and incidence cut-points based on the estimated threshold whereby LTBI treatment would benefit an individual in quality-adjusted life years [6,21]. In other words, in this cohort, people at these cut-points had active TB incidences exceeding the threshold for an individual benefit of LTBI therapy.…”
Section: Identification Of Ltbi Screening Factors and Active Tuberculosis Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined a country of origin as having a high TB burden if it had a TB incidence >200/100 000 people, and limited this potential screening population to people migrating to BC at age ≤50 years. We selected these age and incidence cut-points based on the estimated threshold whereby LTBI treatment would benefit an individual in quality-adjusted life years [6,21]. In other words, in this cohort, people at these cut-points had active TB incidences exceeding the threshold for an individual benefit of LTBI therapy.…”
Section: Identification Of Ltbi Screening Factors and Active Tuberculosis Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the effectiveness (in particular the cost-effectiveness) of such programmes remains unclear, since many high-risk migrants do not attend routine follow-up visits [17]. It seems reasonable to consider LTBI treatment as an alternative or as an addition to chest radiograph follow-up, as the benefit of LTBI treatment for high-risk groups is well documented [77,78].…”
Section: Post-migration Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treating high risk migrants for LTBI, once TB disease has been ruled out, should benefit individual migrants and the general public [56], although formal cost effectiveness analyses remain limited. A systematic review of 16 studies on LTBI screening among migrants did not arrive at any definite conclusions about the (cost-) effectiveness of this intervention [57].…”
Section: Ltbi Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%