2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit cost analysis of an import access request

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that this pest, though not included in the database, might present a high risk of establishing in Australia. Further analysis utilizing habitat suitability modelling (Kriticos et al 2003), impact simulation modelling (Cook et al 2007), and benefit costs analysis (Cook 2008) may reveal more about the risk this species poses to Australia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows that this pest, though not included in the database, might present a high risk of establishing in Australia. Further analysis utilizing habitat suitability modelling (Kriticos et al 2003), impact simulation modelling (Cook et al 2007), and benefit costs analysis (Cook 2008) may reveal more about the risk this species poses to Australia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the relatively close proximity of NZ apple producers to the Australian market, this suggests that the landed price of NZ apples is a reasonable proxy for the world price. Using figures from Cook (2008) as a guide, we assume that shipping costs (including loading and road freight costs) involved in transporting product from NZ to Australia are in the order of $400/T. Data from FAO (2009) from 2002 to 2006 were used to construct a linear time‐series to project a 2008 NZ farm gate price of $680/T.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…$1190/T), at which 2650T will be imported. Wholesale and retail marketing margins – Wholesale margins are specified as a pert distribution with a minimum value of 10 per cent, a most likely value of 20 per cent and a maximum value of 30 per cent. Retail margins are estimated using a pert distribution with a minimum value of 30 per cent, a most likely value of 45 per cent and a maximum value of 60 per cent (Cook 2008). Both wholesale and retail‐marketing margins are assumed constant in percentage terms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow of biosecurity‐related information between trading partners is also limited, giving rise to the tendency for governments to overlook net social and economic gains from trade due to unknown IAS risks. ( 73,74 ) For instance, in setting conditions of product entry to Australia, Biosecurity Australia refers to relevant standards set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, the Office International des Epizooties (the World Organization for Animal Health), and the International Plant Protection Convention. However, the SPS Agreement allows these international standards to be exceeded when IRAs carried out by Biosecurity Australia deem additional measures to be necessary to reduce the risk of IAS incursion to a level consistent with the national appropriate level of protection.…”
Section: Australian Biosecuriy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models too are rarely used, but when combined with models of IAS impacts they effectively form a benefit‐cost framework for evaluating trade decisions. ( 73,74,76 ) The use of these analyses in trade decisions requires changes to the SPS Agreement to accommodate the use of consumer welfare analyses.…”
Section: Adaptive Preborder and Border Defensementioning
confidence: 99%