2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-014-9226-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit–cost analysis of a randomized evaluation of Communities That Care: monetizing intervention effects on the initiation of delinquency and substance use through grade 12

Abstract: Objective To determine whether the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system is a cost-beneficial intervention. Methods Data were from a longitudinal panel of 4,407 youth participating in a randomized controlled trial including 24 towns in 7 states, matched in pairs within state and randomly assigned to condition. Significant differences favoring intervention youth in sustained abstinence from delinquency, alcohol use, and tobacco use through Grade 12 were monetized and compared to economic investment in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the use of an RCT additionally lends confidence to the results, as "the validity of a cost-benefit analysis obviously depends on the quality of the evaluation research design on which it is based" (Painter and Farrington 2001: 3). This also answers recent calls for researchers to more readily translate findings of randomized experiments into financial terms to quantify the costs of particular policy choices (Kuklinski et al 2015;Sherman 2010).…”
Section: Scope Of the Current Studysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Second, the use of an RCT additionally lends confidence to the results, as "the validity of a cost-benefit analysis obviously depends on the quality of the evaluation research design on which it is based" (Painter and Farrington 2001: 3). This also answers recent calls for researchers to more readily translate findings of randomized experiments into financial terms to quantify the costs of particular policy choices (Kuklinski et al 2015;Sherman 2010).…”
Section: Scope Of the Current Studysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For example, the U.S. Office of Adolescent Health is funding 75 communities to use GTO to implement EBPs for teen pregnancy prevention for five years and is providing the same level of TA support described here. While TA does increase cost, implementation support models in the substance abuse prevention domain have shown the cost could be recouped by the savings expected by better outcomes (Kuklinski, Fagan, Hawkins, Briney, & Catalano, 2015). Still, more research is needed on the cost implications of GTO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefit-cost analyses of CTC effects on behavioral outcomes measured in Grades 8 and 12 showed economic benefits of CTC were largely due to preventing the initiation of delinquent behavior, with some additional benefit from sustained abstinence from cigarette smoking and alcohol use initiation (Kuklinski et al 2012, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%