2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the different status of each participating member in the Game process, the Game is divided into Nash Game, master slave Game (Stackelberg Game), etc. [27].…”
Section: Optimization Model Of Stackelberg Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the different status of each participating member in the Game process, the Game is divided into Nash Game, master slave Game (Stackelberg Game), etc. [27].…”
Section: Optimization Model Of Stackelberg Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loehman et al [43] used an index similar to the Shapley-Shubik power index to measure power in a cooperative game. This index was used in several later studies to evaluate the fairness of a given allocation among all players [37,40,44].…”
Section: Fairness Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the standard deviation and represents the average value. The greater the value of FI, the larger the instability of the solution [37,40,44].…”
Section: Fairness Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, cooperative game theory has begun to be used to realize energy saving on the micro level. Based on cooperative game theory, Wu et al [86][87][88] developed models for optimization of distributed energy networks which were integrated with heating interchanges to realize cooperative energy saving and cost effectiveness. However, research exploring cooperative energy saving from the perspective of macro-management remains scant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%