2018
DOI: 10.20334/2018-034-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bendrosios žemės ūkio politikos tiesioginių išmokų sistemos poveikio žemės ūkio tvarumui vertinimas

Abstract: Vadovė dr. Rasa MELNIKIENĖ (Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutas, ekonomika-04S). Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universiteto Ekonomikos mokslo krypties disertacijos gynimo taryba: Pirmininkas prof. dr. Manuela TVARONAVIČIENĖ (Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas, ekonomika-04S). Nariai: prof. habil. dr. Romualdas GINEVIČIUS (Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas, ekonomika-04S), dr. Agnese KRIEVINA (Latvijos valstybinis agrarinės ekonomikos institutas, ekonomika-04S), doc. dr. Neringa STONČIUVIENĖ (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Narayanan and Gulati [19] defined a smallholder "as a farmer (crop or livestock) practicing a mix of commercial and subsistence production or either, where the family provides the majority of labour and the farm provides the principal source of income". Thus, the depth of the problem is also determined by the fact that there is no clear cut-off and methodology for determining the boundaries between small-, medium-and large-scale farms [20].…”
Section: Socioeconomic Sustainability Of Farms In Lithuanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Narayanan and Gulati [19] defined a smallholder "as a farmer (crop or livestock) practicing a mix of commercial and subsistence production or either, where the family provides the majority of labour and the farm provides the principal source of income". Thus, the depth of the problem is also determined by the fact that there is no clear cut-off and methodology for determining the boundaries between small-, medium-and large-scale farms [20].…”
Section: Socioeconomic Sustainability Of Farms In Lithuanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards R indicator, farmers are vulnerable when they do not have any other income accept from farming [33]. This idea is being underscored by other scholars who emphasize not only the policy, but also the responsibility of the farmers for the level of income received, the promotion of diversification of agricultural activity [20,37].…”
Section: Assessment Of the Impact On The Social Sustainability Of Smamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreasing level of diversification in Lithuanian agriculture, which was determined by the current system of DP under CAP [48], resulting in 80% of export in agricultural goods such as wheat and canola, and agricultural sector being the main employer in rural regions [49], makes the whole economic sustainability very vulnerable, as it is very susceptible to changes in a World's turbulent international trade environment, shifts in consumption habits, and technology adjustments (as canola is also used in the production of biofuel) and requires additional preventive measures in a case of manifestation of abovementioned risks [45].…”
Section: The Negative Outcomes Of Cap Direct Payments Onto Rural Sustainability In Lithuaniamentioning
confidence: 99%