2015
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2015.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bendamustine-based conditioning for non-Hodgkin lymphoma autologous transplantation: an increasing risk of renal toxicity

Abstract: Abbreviations: aaIPI = Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index; DLBCL = diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MCL = mantle-cell lymphoma; R-DHAP = rituximab-dexamethasone aracytine carboplatine; TCLO = transfert lung factor for CO. a Only for patients with DLBCL.Bone Marrow Transplantation (2016) 51, 319-321

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
5
41
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[44][45][46][47][48] Recently, a single-center, retrospective study in 29 R/R patients (DLBCL, n ¼ 18; mantle cell lymphoma, n ¼ 11) followed at the PaoliCalmettes Cancer Center in France, reported that patients given Benda-EAM were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) more frequently than a historic, matched cohort treated with conventional BEAM (24% versus 11%, respectively; p ¼ 0.07). [17] In addition, rates of Grade 3 renal and cardiac toxicity were significantly greater in patients given Benda-EAM than those given BEAM (renal toxicity, p < 0.001; cardiac toxicity, p ¼ 0.02). However, there are a number of limitations of the later study that do not allow for adequate interpretation of the safety data.…”
Section: Benda-eammentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[44][45][46][47][48] Recently, a single-center, retrospective study in 29 R/R patients (DLBCL, n ¼ 18; mantle cell lymphoma, n ¼ 11) followed at the PaoliCalmettes Cancer Center in France, reported that patients given Benda-EAM were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) more frequently than a historic, matched cohort treated with conventional BEAM (24% versus 11%, respectively; p ¼ 0.07). [17] In addition, rates of Grade 3 renal and cardiac toxicity were significantly greater in patients given Benda-EAM than those given BEAM (renal toxicity, p < 0.001; cardiac toxicity, p ¼ 0.02). However, there are a number of limitations of the later study that do not allow for adequate interpretation of the safety data.…”
Section: Benda-eammentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[15] Standard BEAM consists of carmustine (300 mg/m 2 x1, day -6), etoposide (200 mg/m 2 , days -5 to -2), cytarabine (200 mg/m 2 b.i.d., days -5 to -2), and melphalan (140 mg/kg/day Â1, days -1). [16,17] Studies using BEAM in R/R NHL and HL have demonstrated three-and five-year PFS rates of 39% to 81% and 35% to 69%, respectively. [12,13,15,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] (Table 1) Long-term OS rates have ranged from 59% to 88% at three years and from 41% to 81% at five years.…”
Section: The Beam Regimenmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Atrial fibrillation was reported in 10 and 8% of patients in the studies by Garciaz and Noesslinger et al, 41,44 , respectively. Need for ICU management was reported in 28% of patients in the study by Garciaz et al 44 3-Year PFS and OD were 72% in the study by Visani et al b Resolved in all cases (in Martin, three patients already had a kidney failure episode).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…39,40 Several reports on the use of a bendamustine-based conditioning regimen before auto-HSCT were recently published as abstracts (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2) 41-43 and a journal letter. 44 Bendamustine was used at 200 mg/m 2 /day for two successive days in these studies, except for the study reported by Martino et al, 42 in which bendamustine was used at a dose of 100 mg/m 2 in combination with melphalan for patients with multiple myeloma. Toxicities were comparable between the different studies ( Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%