2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking three low-cost, low-maintenance cloud height measurement systems and ECMWF cloud heights against a ceilometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the CSS is used as a part of an all-sky imager based nowcasting system or utilized to derive cloud heights, an inexpensive camera could be added, providing a complete system. A CSS and a shadow camera based system, which derives cloud heights, is presented and validated against a ceilometer on the same 59 days in another publication (Kuhn et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the CSS is used as a part of an all-sky imager based nowcasting system or utilized to derive cloud heights, an inexpensive camera could be added, providing a complete system. A CSS and a shadow camera based system, which derives cloud heights, is presented and validated against a ceilometer on the same 59 days in another publication (Kuhn et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. The deviations stem mostly from optically thin clouds and clouds at large altitudes (see Kuhn et al (2018b)). If such clouds trigger CSS measurements at all, the accuracy is poor.…”
Section: The Shadow Camera Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example for the validation of a subtask, the validation of a cloud detection approach is discussed in this section. Validations of other subtask, for instance, the derivation of cloud heights and cloud speeds, are presented elsewhere.…”
Section: Validation Of Cloud Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the system with added value in terms of functionality and gives extra data to incorporate in the next steps of the image processing and forecasting pipeline. A recent paper comparing the use of different instruments to measure the CBH concluded that using a pair of inexpensive cameras was the most cost-effective alternative in comparison with other methods such as a ceilometer or LIDAR [48]. In fact, cloud base height is quite important to estimate the position of the shadows if a ray tracing approach is taken and it can also be included as a feature if Machine Learning methods are preferred, as it correlates with the position of the clouds in the image and the recorded irradiance or PV production.…”
Section: Skyimager In the Canary Islandsmentioning
confidence: 99%