Benchmarking the student experience: the offshore campus experience

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to look at the role of the student experience questionnaire in collecting students' perceptions of their experiences in studying at an offshore campus of an Australian University, compared with the experiences of the University's students in Australia. In particular, it seeks to highlight the difference in perceptions of students resulting, for example, from the size of the campus versus the size of other campuses and the whole institution.Design/methodology/approachThe case study is based on a student learning experience questionnaire utilised by a large research‐intensive Australian tertiary institution (with two overseas campuses). The results of the questionnaire are compared between one overseas campus and the whole institution. The case study looks at the experiences of the overseas campus compared with the Australian experience. Although the case study is situated within one institution, there are aspects and lessons that are applicable to other institutions internationally, in particular when considering collecting student feedback in relation to multi‐campus or multi‐venue programmes.FindingsHigher satisfaction rates for different aspects of student learning experience were identified at the overseas campus in comparison with the whole institution. This was attributed to the smaller size of the overseas campus and thus better engagement of and personal attention to students at this campus. This finding may be particularly relevant to other international institutions in relation to the role of an institution's size and collection of student feedback.Practical implicationsThe case study outlines a number of strategies adopted to enhance student engagement and subsequently to improve the aspects which they have indicated as being less satisfactory. The institution was chosen as an example of how particular strategies may be adopted in other institutions.Originality/valueEnhancement of student experience is pre‐conditioned by good survey response rates among students for an institution to base its actions on opinions of a sufficiently high number of students. This paper describes a successful strategy of engaging students adopted by a large research‐intensive Australian university, and thus increasing survey response rates.

The effect of service quality on behavioural intention: the mediating role of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities

“…In this case, the institutions are involved actively in the production process, while the students who used the services will further influence the performance and quality of the services (Sadeh and Garkaz, 2015). Student feedback on the service quality provided a very useful information for performance improvement of an institution especially in the training course content, teaching and learning facets, and quality measurement methods (Sid Nair et al ., 2011). In general, the SERVPERF measurement (perception-only) as recommended by Cronin and Taylor (1992) has been adopted to investigate the student perceived service quality (SPSQ) in this study.…”

MEDIATING EFFECT OF CORPORATE IMAGE AND STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SERVICE QUALITY AND STUDENTS’ LOYALTY IN TVET HLIs

“…This study measured the overall students' satisfaction, and the concept of students' satisfaction was derived from customers' satisfaction. Measuring students' satisfaction is very important as it is valuable for institution's performance and continuous improvement inclusive of teaching aspect and curriculum design (Nair, Murdoch, & Mertova, 2011). Thus, the management of TVET HLIs should maximise students' satisfaction since it will affect their loyalty.…”

Determining Factors of Students’ Satisfaction with Malaysian Skills Training Institutes

“…There are important items to consider when measuring student response to service quality. Student response is valuable for performance enhancement, including the teaching aspect and curriculum design (Nair et al, 2011). Sirvanci (1996 as mentioned in (Mahapatra & Khan, 2007) specifies that the main customers of learning institutions are students and they play multiple roles in the institution.…”