Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w6-243-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking the Optical Resolving Power of Uav Based Camera Systems

Abstract: ABSTRACT:UAV based imaging and 3D object point generation is an established technology. Some of the UAV users try to address (very) highaccuracy applications, i.e. inspection or monitoring scenarios. In order to guarantee such level of detail and accuracy high resolving imaging systems are mandatory. Furthermore, image quality considerably impacts photogrammetric processing, as the tie point transfer, mandatory for forming the block geometry, fully relies on the radiometric quality of images. Thus, empirical t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the FOVEON technology allows to capture all three colour channels for each individual pixel, the use of Bayer filters and following demosaicking, which is standard for all the remaining cameras, is not necessary here. The influence of image de-mosaicking is discussed and comprehensively analysed in Meißner et al (2017). As mentioned, the Phantom 3 (using TIF) shows very good performance, not only in the group of proprietary DJI systems, further confirming the previous assumption that this camera is already close to the concept of metric camera design.…”
Section: Lab Calibrationssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the FOVEON technology allows to capture all three colour channels for each individual pixel, the use of Bayer filters and following demosaicking, which is standard for all the remaining cameras, is not necessary here. The influence of image de-mosaicking is discussed and comprehensively analysed in Meißner et al (2017). As mentioned, the Phantom 3 (using TIF) shows very good performance, not only in the group of proprietary DJI systems, further confirming the previous assumption that this camera is already close to the concept of metric camera design.…”
Section: Lab Calibrationssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Due to the fast consumer product cycles some of the investigated systems have already been re-placed by their successors. This paper can be seen in connection of the work from Meißner et al (2017) -to be submitted to this UAV-g conference -where the analysis of radiometric performance of UAV based cameras is discussed. Some of the cameras investigated from geometrical point of view here also were radiometrically analysed by Meißner et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful planning and implementation of fixed-wing UAV missions and an effective photogrammetric workflow are both required to acquire reliable image-based point cloud data with high spatial, temporal, and spectral resolution (e.g., [67,68]). …”
Section: General Considerations For Forestry Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this sensor technique, the images have better micro-contrast compared to Bayer pattern sensors which leads to better image measurements, e.g., target detection (cf. Greiwe and Gehrke 2013b;Meißner et al 2017).…”
Section: Photogrammetric Measurements Using Uasmentioning
confidence: 99%