2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking the flotation performance of ores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulphides may show a different value of the contact angle within individual grains, which is probably caused by heterogeneity of particles [7]. A value of contact angle on the mineral surface is also affected by surface roughness [8], both at micro [9] and macroscopic scale [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulphides may show a different value of the contact angle within individual grains, which is probably caused by heterogeneity of particles [7]. A value of contact angle on the mineral surface is also affected by surface roughness [8], both at micro [9] and macroscopic scale [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the milled ore feeds, collected from the swirling pulp in the flotation cell prior to flotation, were sieved to −75 + 38 µm in order to exclude any fine materials that may report to the concentrate through entrainment and entrapment, rather than true flotation [41,42]. The −75 + 38 µm fraction most likely contains material that reports to the concentrate by true flotation, while the coarser particles (e.g., >75 µm) and the finer materials (e.g., <38 µm) float poorly [43,44]. Although optimization of the flotation kinetics may still result in the efficient recovery of both fine and coarse particles [45,46], this is not the primary focus of the present contribution.…”
Section: Automated Mineralogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that attachment time depends on particle size (Yoon and Yordan, 1991;Gu et al, 2003). However, it was not possible to use the narrower sized fraction for bubble-particle attachment measurements because the amount of collected fraction (53-106 lm) was less than 1 g. Additionally, the selected size fraction is in the range of optimum floatability (Muganda et al, 2012) and thus was considered suitable for the bubble-particle attachment measurements.…”
Section: Flotation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%