2023
DOI: 10.1002/qute.202300043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Simulated and Physical Quantum Processing Units Using Quantum and Hybrid Algorithms

Mohammad Kordzanganeh,
Markus Buchberger,
Basil Kyriacou
et al.

Abstract: Powerful hardware services and software libraries are vital tools for quickly and affordably designing, testing, and executing quantum algorithms. A robust large‐scale study of how the performance of these platforms scales with the number of qubits is key to providing quantum solutions to challenging industry problems. This work benchmarks the runtime and accuracy for a representative sample of specialized high‐performance simulated and physical quantum processing units. Results show the QMware simulator can r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this challenge, we employ the PennyLane framework [72], which provides access to a variety of optimization techniques. We utilize the parameter shift rule [73], which is compatible with physical implementations of quantum computing [74]. This method involves evaluating the gradient of a quantum circuit by shifting the parameters in the circuit and computing the corresponding change in the circuit's output.…”
Section: Training and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this challenge, we employ the PennyLane framework [72], which provides access to a variety of optimization techniques. We utilize the parameter shift rule [73], which is compatible with physical implementations of quantum computing [74]. This method involves evaluating the gradient of a quantum circuit by shifting the parameters in the circuit and computing the corresponding change in the circuit's output.…”
Section: Training and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training process of the hybrid PINN does not differ from that of the classical PINN except in the following ways. Firstly, all calculations are done on the classical simulator of quantum hardware, the QMware server [63], which has recently been shown to be quite good for running hybrid algorithms [64].…”
Section: Training Hqpinnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with each additional qubit, the runtime of the quantum circuit execution will approximately double. That means, according to the benchmarks [64], the runtime will become significant beyond 20 qubits circuits. Nonetheless, with the development of quantum computers, the scaling is expected to be more favorable as the runtime on a quantum chip would stay constant in case the circuit depth is fixed.…”
Section: Training Hqpinnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IonQ implements a high-fidelity gate-based quantum processing unit through a process known as laser pumping trapped-ions explained in [36]. The hardware was shown to be one of the most accurate in recent benchmarking tests [37]. We specifically used the hardware introduced in [38] with a single-qubit fidelity of 0.997 and a two-qubit fidelity of 0.9725.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%