2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp502475e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Quantum Chemical Methods for the Calculation of Molecular Dipole Moments and Polarizabilities

Abstract: The calculation of molecular electric moments, polarizabilities, and electrostatic potentials is a widespread application of quantum chemistry. Although a range of wave function and density functional theory (DFT) methods have been applied in these calculations, combined with a variety of basis sets, there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of how accurate these methods are. To benchmark the accuracy of these methods, the dipole moments and polarizabilities of a set of 46 molecules were calculated using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
258
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
16
258
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For isotropic polarizability and norm of dipole moment, target accuracies of 0.1a 3 0 and 0.1D were used. Again, these values are within the predictive uncertainty using CC level of theory [27]. Figure 2 displays learning curves of randomly generated and GA-optimized training sets for out-of-sample predictions of B3LYP level enthalpies of atomization, H, using both direct learning as well as the ∆H B3LYP PM7 -ML model [3].…”
Section: A Gdb8 Learningmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For isotropic polarizability and norm of dipole moment, target accuracies of 0.1a 3 0 and 0.1D were used. Again, these values are within the predictive uncertainty using CC level of theory [27]. Figure 2 displays learning curves of randomly generated and GA-optimized training sets for out-of-sample predictions of B3LYP level enthalpies of atomization, H, using both direct learning as well as the ∆H B3LYP PM7 -ML model [3].…”
Section: A Gdb8 Learningmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, it contains sufficient diffuse and polarization functions in order to give an accurate description of the outervalence region. It has been shown [40,41] that the Sadlej basis set has effectively the same accuracy as the aug-ccpVTZ basis set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43,91 Hybrid functionals also tend to perform better in predicting IR intensities. 92 In fact, PBE has been recently shown by Rowley and coworkers 43 to systematically overestimate polarizabilities in their benchmarking study, which may result in large differences in SFG intensities. However, we do observe improvements in the spectral matches when pairing the pure functionals with the Dunning basis sets, as seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%