2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical shape models are used to perform wide range of tasks in biomedical research ranging from visualizing organs ( Orkild et al, 2022 ), bones ( Lenz et al, 2021 ), and tumors ( Krol et al, 2013 ), to aiding surgical planning ( Borghi et al, 2020 ), monitoring disease progression ( Uetani et al, 2015 ; Faber et al, 2020 ), and implant design ( Goparaju et al, 2022 ). Shapes can be represented using an implicit (deformation fields ( Durrleman et al, 2014 ), level set methods ( Samson et al, 2000 )) or explicit (set of ordered landmarks/points) representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical shape models are used to perform wide range of tasks in biomedical research ranging from visualizing organs ( Orkild et al, 2022 ), bones ( Lenz et al, 2021 ), and tumors ( Krol et al, 2013 ), to aiding surgical planning ( Borghi et al, 2020 ), monitoring disease progression ( Uetani et al, 2015 ; Faber et al, 2020 ), and implant design ( Goparaju et al, 2022 ). Shapes can be represented using an implicit (deformation fields ( Durrleman et al, 2014 ), level set methods ( Samson et al, 2000 )) or explicit (set of ordered landmarks/points) representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches avoid complex parameterization construction steps and the limitations inherent in parametric representations, such as restriction to specific topologies and bias resulting from the choice of basis or template. The non-parametric techniques have been shown to produce more robust and compact models that better retain clinically relevant shape characteristics (Goparaju et al (2018); Goparaju et al (2022)). In this work, we utilize the entropy-based approach to PDM optimization formulated in Cates et al (2007), a. k.a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mappings should be learned from the study population in a data-driven manner to capture the underlying population-specific morphological variability Kulis et al (2013) . Approaches for establishing such mappings that rely on pairwise comparisons (e.g., Styner et al (2006) and Jenkinson et al (2012) ] typically require a predefined atlas for initialization, leading to biased and suboptimal models Goparaju et al (2022) . Group-wise approaches [e.g., Durrleman et al (2014) and Cates et al (2017a) ], on the other hand, observe the entire population to quantify the quality of shape correspondences, and hence better reflect the underlying population variability Goparaju et al (2022) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for establishing such mappings that rely on pairwise comparisons (e.g., Styner et al (2006) and Jenkinson et al (2012) ] typically require a predefined atlas for initialization, leading to biased and suboptimal models Goparaju et al (2022) . Group-wise approaches [e.g., Durrleman et al (2014) and Cates et al (2017a) ], on the other hand, observe the entire population to quantify the quality of shape correspondences, and hence better reflect the underlying population variability Goparaju et al (2022) . Particle-based shape modeling (PSM) Cates et al (2007) and Cates et al (2017a) , in particular, is a state-of-the-art computational approach for constructing point distribution models (PDM) via automatically placing a dense set of corresponding landmarks on a set of shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%