2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2751071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Multi- and Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Under Two Optimization Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies [34]- [36], an unbounded external archive was used to evaluate existing EMO algorithms. In Bringmann et al [34], it was demonstrated that the performance of EMO algorithms was improved by solution selection where a pre-specified number of solutions were selected from stored non-dominated solutions.…”
Section: Proposed Emo Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In some studies [34]- [36], an unbounded external archive was used to evaluate existing EMO algorithms. In Bringmann et al [34], it was demonstrated that the performance of EMO algorithms was improved by solution selection where a pre-specified number of solutions were selected from stored non-dominated solutions.…”
Section: Proposed Emo Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By selecting the same number of non-dominated solutions from the archive as the final result of each algorithm, different EMO algorithms with different population size were fairly compared. In Tanabe et al [36], EMO algorithms were compared in two performance comparison scenarios: One is based on the final population and the other is based on the selected solutions from the archive.…”
Section: Proposed Emo Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past decade, NSGA-III has been introduced as an improved version of NSGA-II in which the crowding distance-based method was replaced with the reference vectors-based niching method. On the other hand, CMOPSO and RVEA are considered recent development evolutionary algorithms which possess competitive advantages over the NSGA-II when tested on benchmark problems [28]. The coding was performed through PlatEMO in MATLAB [29].…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%