2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-009-0251-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Image Segmentation Algorithms

Abstract: We present a thorough quantitative evaluation of four image segmentation algorithms on images from the Berkeley Segmentation Database. The algorithms are evaluated using an efficient algorithm for computing precision and recall with regard to human ground-truth boundaries. We test each segmentation method over a representative set of input parameters, and present tuning curves that fully characterize algorithm performance over the complete image database. We complement the evaluation on the BSD with segmentati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1:1 matching is possible by adding outlier nodes. Any match to an outlier or beyond some distance threshold is counted as a mismatch.In a recent variation on this approach (E-PR), Estrada et al [6] include 'no intervening contours' and 'same side' constraints. While these constraints serve to encourage ordering consistency between the two contours being matched, neither approach strictly enforces ordering consistency in a global sense.…”
Section: Precision-recall Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1:1 matching is possible by adding outlier nodes. Any match to an outlier or beyond some distance threshold is counted as a mismatch.In a recent variation on this approach (E-PR), Estrada et al [6] include 'no intervening contours' and 'same side' constraints. While these constraints serve to encourage ordering consistency between the two contours being matched, neither approach strictly enforces ordering consistency in a global sense.…”
Section: Precision-recall Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the EDISON software which is an improvement of the mean shift [20]. A graph-cut and normalized-cut that are popularly used due to their performance and publicly available source codes were already evaluated to be slower than the mean shift by [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image segmentation has a long history in computer vision [8]. One of the most prominent recent trends is to make objective the evaluation of segmentation results [9][10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seven metrics utilized to evaluate CLEG and the compared algorithms are computation time (time), completeness (comp), correctness (corr) [49], reference cross-lap (RCL), detection cross-lap (DCL) [50,51], boundary precision (BP), and boundary recall (BR) [52].…”
Section: Roof Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%