Benchmarking culture and performance in Chinese organizations

Abstract

PurposeTo show differences in organizational performance, management style and systems, resulting from cultural differences in three organizational types: foreign‐owned, joint ventures, and Chinese‐owned and operated.Design/methodology/approachA survey method was used to assess the management systems, leadership and styles within the cultural contexts of the three types of organizations using Hofstede's four cultural dimensions. Organizational performance was measured using balanced scorecard method and factors suggested by other authors. Performance measures were compared across the three types of organizations.FindingsForeign‐owned and operated companies performed significantly better than their joint venture (JV) and Chinese‐owned and operated organizations as measured by financial perspective, customer perspective, internal business perspective, innovation and learning perspective and technological assessment. There was clear evidence of benchmarking among Chinese‐owned and operated organizations, learning from JVs and FOOs.Research limitations/implicationsThis study used only managers who had a minimum of five years' experience. The study also did not entertain cross‐breeding management styles.Practical implicationsProvides useful information about benchmarking patterns being used by Chinese owned and operated organizations. As the blending of cultures in global organizations continues, learning organizations benchmark not only process technologies but also management systems, leadership and styles.Originality/valueThe paper clearly provides a direct comparison among the three types of organizations operating in the Chinese cultural context. The methodology used is a blend of different approaches to ensure comprehensive assessment of organizational culture and performance.

Knowledge Management Systems and Human Resource Management Policies for Innovation Benchmarking: a Study of ST Ericsson

“…For example, benchmarking with China has been researched by Garg and Ma [18] and Li-Hua and Simon [19]. Many of these articles show the speed by which Asian companies are gaining on their Western competitors.…”

The Effect of Strategic Orientation on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovation

“…Nonetheless, [109] claimed that financial measures of performance only capture one part of organizational performance. This is supported by [110] who advocated the movement toward recognizing non-financial measures, given that they focus on a firm's long-term success [27]. Non-financial performance relates to the organization's effective marketing activities and can be evaluated through customer loyalty, customer satisfaction, market share, quality, new product development, and so on [3] and [111].…”

Proposing processes of global performance management: an analysis of the literature

“…In an interesting investigation of the use of benchmarking by foreign owned, joint venture and Chinese owned and operated firms in China, Garg and Ma (2005) concluded that process performance goals (e.g. ISO 90002) and employee competency (in key information systems and technologies) were perceived to be critical elements of employee and firm performance and that foreign owned operations and joint ventures were more comfortable with their ability to focus successfully on these performance measures than their Chinese owned and operated counterparts.…”