2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese cities: A comparative study based on high-resolution gridded data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with previous studies of the spatial distribution of carbon emissions in Chinese cities. The total quantity of emissions exhibited a gradual decreasing trend when moving from eastern to western regions [ 53 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with previous studies of the spatial distribution of carbon emissions in Chinese cities. The total quantity of emissions exhibited a gradual decreasing trend when moving from eastern to western regions [ 53 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the analysis of input-output efficiency, some scholars have adopted the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to quantitatively explore the influence of efficiency differences of decision-making units (DMUs). These were based on economic theories to get more accurate results with a set method model (Dong et al 2013;Cai et al 2019;Jin and Kim 2019;Sun and Huang 2020). However, not only does the SFA model need to be set in the form of specific functions, but the assumptions must also be relatively strict.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we first estimate the full sample panel data of China, and observe how the estimation results differ from time series data analysis. Then, in order to explore how FD affects CE in different regions with different characteristics, we refer to Yan et al [31], Pan et al [32], Zhen et al [33] and Cai et al [34] and divide four sub-panels from two dimensions of CE and FD. We calculate the average CE and FD of each province in China from 1997 to 2016.…”
Section: Full-sample Panel Data and Sub-sample Panel Datamentioning
confidence: 99%