Benchmarking Cancer Centers: From Care Pathways to Integrated Practice Units

Abstract

Structuring cancer care into pathways can reduce variability in clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. International benchmarking can help centers with regard to development, implementation, and evaluation. A further step in the development of multidisciplinary care is to organize care in integrated practice units (IPUs), encompassing the whole pathway and relevant organizational aspects. However, research on this topic is limited. This article describes the development and results of a benchmark tool for cancer care pathways and explores IPU development in cancer centers. The benchmark tool was developed according to a 13-step benchmarking method and piloted in 7 European cancer centers. Centers provided data and site visits were performed to understand the context in which the cancer center operates and to clarify additional questions. Benchmark data were structured into pathway development and evaluation and assessed against key IPU features. Benchmark results showed that most centers have formalized multidisciplinary pathways and that care teams differed in composition, and found almost 2-fold differences in mammography use efficiency. Suggestions for improvement included positioning pathways formally and structurally evaluating outcomes at a sufficiently high frequency. Based on the benchmark, 3 centers indicating that they had a breast cancer IPU were scored differently on implementation. Overall, we found that centers in Europe are in various stages of development of pathways and IPUs, ranging from an informal pathway structure to a full IPU-type of organization. A benchmark tool for care pathways was successfully developed and tested, and is available in an open format. Our tool allows for the assessment of pathway organization and can be used to assess the status of IPU development. Opportunities for improvement were identified regarding the organization of care pathways and the development toward IPUs. Three centers are in varying degrees of implementation and can be characterized as breast cancer IPUs. Organizing cancer care in an IPU could yield multiple performance improvements.

Benchmarking of survival outcomes following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A review of existing processes and the introduction of an international system from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)

“…Accessed 31/05/ 2019), aims to provide a means of comparing clinical performance with the wider dataset. Benchmarking has become mandatory in a number of countries for a range of medical and surgical procedures and is used by competent authorities, regulators and payers for quality assurance of clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of patient care [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, there are challenges in the delivery of benchmarking, particularly in defining a fair, accurate and clinically meaningful methodology acceptable to all stakeholders underpinned by a reliable and complete source of clinical outcomes data.…”

Benchmarking Time-to-Treatment Initiation in Sarcoma Care Using Real-World-Time Data

“…The shift from volume-based to value-based care augments the overall patient experience and satisfaction. The quality of care is gauged by objective indicators and benchmarks, encouraging healthcare providers to continually enhance their services to achieve better patient outcomes [1][2][3]12,29,51,52]. TTI also differed among the treatment centers, especially in the context of surgical interventions.…”

“…Benchmarking plays a pivotal role in a patient-centered and quality-driven healthcare system [1][2][3]. It goes beyond identifying areas that need improvement, providing insights into various aspects like overall performance, treatment timelines, and efficiency [4].…”

Turning teams and pathways into integrated practice units: Appearance characteristics and added value

“…Recently, a benchmark was undertaken in seven European countries on the development of cancer pathways toward IPUs and found widely varying scores. 14…”

“…It was concluded that the reported tool allows for the assessment of pathway organization and can be used to identify opportunities for improvement regarding the organization of care pathways toward IPUs. 14…”